Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239961›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2021

Patient and Clinician Perceptions about Remote Video Visits for Musculoskeletal Problems: A Qualitative Study.

Anne-Britt E Dekker, Iris Kleiss, David Ring, Kasey Claborn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne-Britt E DekkerDell Medical School Austin, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Iris KleissDell Medical School Austin, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
David RingDell Medical School Austin, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Kasey ClabornDepartment of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Adherence Intervention for HIV-infected Drug UsersK23DA039037 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CLABORN, KASEY R · 2015 to 2019
$919k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA039037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn understanding of patient and clinician opinions about remote video musculoskeletal consultations might help determine how to increase appeal and utilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceptions of remote video musculoskeletal consultations. Our research questions was what are patient and clinician facilitators and barriers for the use of remote video consultations?

methodsPrior to the COVID-19 pandemic 27 English speaking adult patients seeking ambulatory care for a musculoskeletal problem, and 10 English-speaking musculoskeletal clinicians were interviewed using a guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using applied thematic analysis.

resultsPatient and clinician incentives for remote video consultations included increased convenience, lower costs, less waiting time, and a better experience. Patient and clinician barriers to remote video consultations included concerns about familiarity with technology, lack of personal interaction and physical examination, inability to perform procedures, difficulties with reimbursement (clinicians), as well as technical, logistical, and privacy issues.

conclusionThis qualitative study performed prior to the pandemic found that adoption of remote video consultation for musculoskeletal problems may improve with seamless, efficient, and effective care, at an affordable price, particularly if the human connection is similar to what occurs in person.

Indexed as

Remote consultationsVirtual visits

Identifiers

PMID34239961
PMCPMC8221437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.