Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239956›Full record

ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2021

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography Method of Graf in the detection of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Mohammadreza Chavoshi, Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad, Mehrzad Mahdizadeh, Fatemeh Zamani

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammadreza ChavoshiDepartment of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali MirshahvaladDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehrzad MahdizadehDepartment of Radiology, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ZamaniDepartment of Radiology, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRChildren's Medical Center · IRShariati Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to perform a meta-analysis on the performance of Graf's ultrasonography method in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods: A query was conducted on electronic bibliographic databases until the end of October 2020. The inclusion criteria entailed: 1. the use of Graf method in less than 12 weeks of age, 2. the use of follow-up as reference test, and 3. provision of crude data. Pooled diagnostic performance measures were calculated. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was utilized to assess the quality of the included studies. The hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HROC) curves were also drawn. Results: Six articles (including seven populations, 11,012 patients) were considered eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were obtained at 93% (95% CI: 0.57-0.99) and 97% (95% CI:0.86-0.99), respectively (area under curve= 0.99). The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio, as well as diagnostic odds ratio, was reported as 28.4, 0.07, and 396, respectively. Conclusion: As evidenced by the obtained results, Graf's method is a useful ultrasonography technique with acceptable accuracy for screening DDH in neonates. However, there are uncertainties about the best population and age for screening. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to the proper training of this method to reduce the number of operator errors.

Indexed as

DDHDiagnostic performanceGrafMeta-analysisPediatricsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34239956
PMCPMC8221445
OpenAlexW3131251190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.