ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2021
Tracking bacterial DNA patterns in septic progression using 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Diagnostic Methods for Infective Endocarditis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloodstream infections remain prevalent in intensive care units, leading to a public health challenge worldwide. Routine diagnosis is mainly based on blood culture, but the technique is limited by its time-consuming process and relatively low sensitivity. Emerging molecular diagnostic tools, such as 16S metagenomics, have been developed for detecting bacteria in the blood samples of septic patients. Using a collection of 168 blood samples from 96 septic patients, 16S metagenomics method followed by bioinformatics were applied to study bacterial alterations during the pathogenesis of sepsis. Significant taxonomic variations were found between the two survival groups at different therapeutic time points through sequential 16S metagenomics research. The results on the third day during the treatment course were notably distinct among the studied groups. 16S metagenomics approach can bring novel genetic insight about microbiological fluctuations during septic progression, which may be utilized as a complementary prognostic application. Further etiologic and pathophysiologic explorations are needed to fully explain the linkage between clinical outcomes and genetic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34239678PMC8255196W3182938969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.