ReviewInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2021
Association of CD4 T cell count and optimal timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and all-cause mortality for HIV-infected adults with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory T Cells Kinetics in Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in HIV-Tuberculosis Co-Infected Individuals.Journal of molecular and clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in initiating ART among HIV-Infected patients in China-risk factors and management.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Tuberculosis-Associated Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome-An Extempore Game of Misfiring with Defense Arsenals.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCD4 T cell count and optimal timing of antiretroviral therapy (ART) during tuberculosis (TB) treatment are challenging. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association of CD4 T cell count and timing of ART initiation with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and all-cause mortality of patients co-infected with HIV/TB.
methodsWe conducted an electronic search of clinical studies dated from January 1980 to December 2019 in PubMed and EMBASE. Randomized, controlled trials evaluating low-base CD4 T cell count (< 50 cells/μL) versus high-base CD4 T cell count (≥ 50 cells/μL), and/or early ART initiation (1 to 28 days after starting TB treatment) versus delayed ART initiation (≥ 28 days after starting TB treatment) were included. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and TB-related immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS-TB). The risk ratio (RR) was calculated as a measure of intervention effect. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the RR.
resultsTen trials (n = 5226) were conducted in North America, Africa, and Asia. We found that low-baseline CD4 T cell count increased the incidence of TB-associated IRIS (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.75; I
conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that low-baseline CD4 T cell count (< 50 cells/μL) in patients co-infected with TB-HIV increases the incidence of TB-associated IRIS and all-cause mortality. Early ART initiation (≤ 28 days) in patients co-infected with TB-HIV increases the incidence of TB-associated IRIS. However, evidence is insufficient to refute or support a survival benefit conferred by the comparison between early ART initiation (≤ 28 days) and delayed ART initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34239668PMC8255206W3181437036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.