Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239550›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Presentation of Novel Hybrid Algorithm for Detection and Classification of Breast Cancer Using Growth Region Method and Probabilistic Neural Network.

Zeynab Nasr Isfahani, Iman Jannat-Dastjerdi, Fatemeh Eskandari, Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, Yaghoub Pourasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probabilistic Neural Networks: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeynab Nasr IsfahaniAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Iman Jannat-DastjerdiDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh EskandariAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Saeid Jafarzadeh GhoushchiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-9010
Yaghoub PourasadDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammography is a significant screening test for early detection of breast cancer, which increases the patient's chances of complete recovery. In this paper, a clustering method is presented for the detection of breast cancer tumor locations and areas. To implement the clustering method, we used the growth region approach. This method detects similar pixels nearby. To find the best initial point for detection, it is essential to remove human interaction in clustering. Therefore, in this paper, the FCM-GA algorithm is used to find the best point for starting growth. Their results are compared with the manual selection method and Gaussian Mixture Model method for verification. The classification is performed to diagnose breast cancer type in two primary datasets of MIAS and BI-RADS using features of GLCM and probabilistic neural network (PNN). Results of clustering show that the presented FCM-GA method outperforms other methods. Moreover, the accuracy of the clustering method for FCM-GA is 94%, as the best approach used in this paper. Furthermore, the result shows that the PNN methods have high accuracy and sensitivity with the MIAS dataset.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMammographyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34239550
PMCPMC8238608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.