Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239465›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Psychometric Properties of the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale Administered to Italian Women in the Perinatal Period.

Alexia Koukopoulos, Cristina Mazza, Lavinia De Chiara, Gabriele Sani, Alessio Simonetti, Georgios D Kotzalidis, Giulia Armani, Gemma Callovini, Marco Bonito, Giovanna Parmigiani and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexia KoukopoulosDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cristina MazzaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Lavinia De ChiaraLucio Bini Centre, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele SaniInstitute of Psychiatry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessio SimonettiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Georgios D KotzalidisLucio Bini Centre, Rome, Italy.
Giulia ArmaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Gemma CalloviniLucio Bini Centre, Rome, Italy.
Marco BonitoDipartimento Materno Infantile, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna ParmigianiDepartment of Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Susanne SomervilleDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
Paolo RomaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gloria AngelettiLucio Bini Centre, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITBaylor College of Medicine · USCentro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature stressed the importance of using valid, reliable measures to assess anxiety in the perinatal period, like the self-rated Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS). We aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Italian PASS version in a sample of Italian women undergoing mental health screening during their third trimester of pregnancy and its diagnostic accuracy in a control perinatal sample of psychiatric outpatients. Sample comprised 289 women aged 33.17 ± 5.08, range 19-46 years, undergoing fetal monitoring during their third trimester of pregnancy, with 49 of them retested 6 months postpartum. Controls were 60 antenatal or postnatal psychiatric outpatients aged 35.71 ± 5.02, range 22-50 years. Groups were assessed through identical self- and clinician-rating scales. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Pearson's correlations and receiver operating characteristic were conducted for PASS. PCA and CPA confirmed four-factor structure with slight differences from the original version. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were supported. Cut-off was 26. The PASS correlated with principal anxiety scales. Despite small sample size, findings confirm reliability and validity of the Italian PASS version in assessing anxiety symptoms in the perinatal period. Its incorporation in perinatal care will improve future mother and child psychological health.

Indexed as

anxietyfactor analysisperinatalpregnancypsychometric propertiesscreening

Identifiers

PMID34239465
PMCPMC8257936
OpenAlexW3174214667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.