ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2021
A Review of Suicide Risk Assessment Tools and Their Measured Psychometric Properties in Korea.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Assessment of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adults: A systematic review of measure psychometric properties and implications for clinical and research utility.Clinical psychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based screening tool for early detection of adolescent suicide risk.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- Specific psychological factors associated with suicidal ideation: a transdiagnostic approach to psychological responses in adolescents.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Multiverse analysis of machine learning: classification between groups defined by suicidal ideation screening status using acoustic features in college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A hierarchical machine learning model for predicting self-harm and suicidal behaviour in hospitalised patients with schizophrenia using clinical history and nursing observations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A highly scalable deep learning language model for common risks prediction among psychiatric inpatients.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Prediction of suicidality in bipolar disorder using variability of intrinsic brain activity and machine learning.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- The Suicidal Intrusions Attributes Scale (SINAS): a new tool measuring suicidal intrusions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Development and validation study of the suicide screening questionnaire-observer rating (SSQ-OR).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While there has been a slew of review studies on suicide measurement tools until now, there were not any reviews focusing on suicide assessment tools available in Korea. This review aimed to examine the psychometric properties of tools developed in Korea or the translated versions from the original tools in their foreign language and to identify potential improvements and supplements for these tools. A literature search was done using the Korean academic information search service, Research Information Service System, to identify the suicide measures to be included in this review. Abstracts were screened to identify which measures were used to assess suicide-related factors. Based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 tools remained and we assessed their psychometric properties. The current review indicated several major findings. First, many of the tools did not report predictive validity and even those with predictive validity were based on past suicide attempts. Second, some of the tools overlooked the interactive component for the cause of suicide. In addition, information to supplement the self-reported and clinician-administered reports by collecting reports from the subjects' families and acquaintances is needed. It is also important to develop a screening tool that examines other aspects of an individual's personal life, including unemployment, bereavement, divorce, and childhood trauma. Moreover, tools that have been studied in more diverse groups of the population are needed to increase external validity. Finally, the linguistic translation of the tools into Korean needs to consider other cultural, social, and psychological factors of the sample of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.