ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presence Is Reality: Rethinking Virtual and Real-World Consciousness.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026Article
- Effect of modality compatibility on dual-task performance in a more naturalistic environment.Psychological research · 2026Article
- HAPTI-Child: a finger-tracking video and keypoint dataset of haptic picture exploration and identification in congenitally blind and visually impaired children.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Evaluating the effectiveness of flight simulator training on developing perceptual-motor skills among flight cadets: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tactile and olfactory stimulation reduce anxiety and enhance autonomic balance: a multisensory approach for healthcare settings.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Multisensory integration, brain plasticity and optogenetics in visual rehabilitation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Multimodal processing of noisy cues in bumblebees.iScience · 2024Article
- A conceptual ethical framework to preserve natural human presence in the use of AI systems in education.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Alterations of Audiovisual Integration in Alzheimer's Disease.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Review
- Efficacy of Multisensory Technology in Post-Stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Consumer Consciousness in Multisensory Extended Reality.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multisensory integration research has allowed us to better understand how humans integrate sensory information to produce a unitary experience of the external world. However, this field is often challenged by the limited ability to deliver and control sensory stimuli, especially when going beyond audio-visual events and outside laboratory settings. In this review, we examine the scope and challenges of new technology in the study of multisensory integration in a world that is increasingly characterized as a fusion of physical and digital/virtual events. We discuss multisensory integration research through the lens of novel multisensory technologies and, thus, bring research in human-computer interaction, experimental psychology, and neuroscience closer together. Today, for instance, displays have become volumetric so that visual content is no longer limited to 2D screens, new haptic devices enable tactile stimulation without physical contact, olfactory interfaces provide users with smells precisely synchronized with events in virtual environments, and novel gustatory interfaces enable taste perception through levitating stimuli. These technological advances offer new ways to control and deliver sensory stimulation for multisensory integration research beyond traditional laboratory settings and open up new experimentations in naturally occurring events in everyday life experiences. Our review then summarizes these multisensory technologies and discusses initial insights to introduce a bridge between the disciplines in order to advance the study of multisensory integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.