ReviewThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2021
The Role of Biologics in the Management of Asthma in the Pediatric Patient.
Review in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe Asthma in School-Age Children: An Updated Appraisal on Biological Options and Challenges in This Age Group.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Health Insurance Type and Outpatient Specialist Care Among Children With Asthma.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Unanswered questions on the use of biologics in pediatric asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Review
- Biologic Therapies in Pediatric Asthma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Severe Pediatric Asthma Therapy: Mepolizumab.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Shifting the Asthma Treatment Paradigm.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of pediatric patients with asthma continues to be a major health issue. For many patients, traditional therapies have been very effective, but for a large number of patients asthma remains poorly controlled. This leads to significant morbidity and impairment to quality of life. Recently, several new biologics, as well as new dosage forms of combination inhaled drugs, have been made available for use adding to the armamentarium of therapy for specific asthma phenotypes. Biologics have shown promise in the more difficult to manage asthma patient. Approved in children, omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E (anti-IgE) antibody, has been available for several years. New agents, like mepolizumab and benralizumab, directed against interleukin (IL) 5, have indications for children >6 and >12 years of age, respectively. Dupilumab, an IL-4- and IL-13-directed antibody, has been studied as well in eosinophilic asthma, with positive results. A thorough understanding of the clinical data of these agents is key, as they may greatly improve the quality of life in children with difficult-to-manage asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.