Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239335›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan.

Amer Mahmoud Sindiani, Faheem Zayed, Eman Hussein Alshdaifat, Hasan M Rawashdeh, Wesam Al-Woshah, Nada Zayed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amer Mahmoud SindianiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-7372
Faheem ZayedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irbid Speciality Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-3228-6694
Eman Hussein AlshdaifatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Hasan M RawashdehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-7741
Wesam Al-WoshahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IBN Al-Nafis Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Nada ZayedDepartment of Dermatology, Albalqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOAl-Balqa Applied University · JOMédecins Sans Frontières · JOYarmouk University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo find out whether couples with predominant female offspring have more chances to produce more female embryos during non-medical pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for male sex selection.

methodsA total of 125 couples who had three or more female offspring and underwent non-medical PGD for male sex selection between 2015 and 2019 were included. Nuclear DNA was analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Two-chromosome (X, Y), 3-chromosome (21, X, Y), and 5-chromosome (13, 18, 21, X, Y) probes were used for FISH. The standard protocol was followed for sperm processing and embryo culture for IVF and PGD.

resultsIn 83.2% of the couples, the ratio of female embryos was higher than male embryos. Independent sample

conclusionA greater variability in the female to male embryonic ratio is produced in couples having predominantly female offspring and seeking non-medical PGD for male sex selection.

Indexed as

embryosinfertilityIVFPGD

Identifiers

PMID34239335
PMCPMC8259936
OpenAlexW3111741639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.