Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2021

Lived Experience of Women Who Underwent Early Removal of Long-Acting Family Planning Methods in Bedesa Town, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Phenomenological Study.

Mohammed Suleiman Obsa, Kassahun Tekle Takiso, Tamiru Tilahun Ayele, Hailu Chare Koyra, Kassahun Tafesse Hidoto, Getahun Getahun Molla Shanka, Lolemo Kelbiso Hanfore, Mihiretu Alemayehu Arba, Antehun Alemayehu Anjulo, Melkamu Worku Kercho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammed Suleiman ObsaDepartment of Anesthesia, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-6579-1136
Kassahun Tekle TakisoSchool of Medicine, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Tamiru Tilahun AyeleDepartment of Anesthesia, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Hailu Chare KoyraDepartment of Pharmacy, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-2431
Kassahun Tafesse HidotoSchool of Public Health, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Getahun Getahun Molla ShankaSchool of Medicine, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Lolemo Kelbiso HanforeDepartment of Nursing, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Mihiretu Alemayehu ArbaSchool of Public Health, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-7476
Antehun Alemayehu AnjuloDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-5857
Melkamu Worku KerchoDepartment of Midwifery, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Zewde ZemaDepartment of Pharmacy, Wolaita Soddo University, Wolaita Soddo, Ethiopia.
Wolaita Sodo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting family planning method (LAFP) is a low-cost yet effective method of reducing maternal mortality, limiting and spacing childbirth. In Ethiopia, the family planning prevalence rate rises from 15% in 2005 to 36% in 2016. However, the discontinuation rate of LAFP is still high in the region. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of women who underwent early removal of long-acting family planning methods in Bedesa town, Southern Ethiopia.

methodsAn interpretative phenomenological study design was employed. Women aged 15-49 years who removed LAFP therapy in the past 12 months were our sampled population. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) by using open-ended structured interview guide. Purposive sampling technique was used to select 10 participants from the family planning logbook registration of Bedesa health center. The interview continued until information saturation was reached. Open code version 4.03 was used to code and facilitate analysis. Transcripts were read and re-read separately to identify emerging themes. A thematic analysis technique was used.

resultsThis study revealed that the side effects, seeking more children and the husband's opposition were the main reason for early removal of LAFP. Amongst side effects, heavy and irregular menses were occurred most frequently. Besides, there were various myths and misconceptions about family planning methods. It also noted that the counseling services provided by health professionals were not adequate.

conclusionSide effects, desired to have more children, and the husband's opposition are the most important reason of early removal of LAFP methods. Furthermore, there were misunderstanding, fear and rumors raised by women about each method. Hence, greater public awareness on family planning should be delivered to change community perception on LAFP methods.

Indexed as

Bedesaearly removallong-acting family planning methodphenomenology

Identifiers

PMID34239332
PMCPMC8259935
OpenAlexW3120839781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.