Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239304›Full record

ArticleVascular health and risk management2021

Radiofrequency Ablation for Axial Reflux Associated with Foam Sclerotherapy for Varicosities in One-Step Approach: A Prospective Cohort Study Comprising Large Diameters Saphenous Veins.

Douglas Poschinger-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Virgini-Magalhães, Luís Cristóvão Porto, Claudia Salvador Amorim, Cristiane Ferreira de Araujo Gomes, Cristina Ribeiro Riguetti-Pinto, Monica Rochedo Mayall, Leonardo Silveira de Castro, Felipe Borges Fagundes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Pain Control in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease and Great Saphenous Vein Reflux.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas Poschinger-FigueiredoTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-603X
Carlos Eduardo Virgini-MagalhãesTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-2298
Luís Cristóvão PortoHistocompatibility and Cryopreservation Laboratory (HLA), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1499-1821
Claudia Salvador AmorimTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Cristiane Ferreira de Araujo GomesTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4329-5374
Cristina Ribeiro Riguetti-PintoTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6509-4018
Monica Rochedo MayallTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-6783
Leonardo Silveira de CastroTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Felipe Borges FagundesTeaching and Health Care Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery's Medical Staff, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital (HUPE), Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed the outcomes and impact on the quality of life following one-step outpatient radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (USGFS) for large reflux with varicosities in the great saphenous vein (GSV).

designProspective, single-centre, analytical cohort. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty symptomatic patients having reflux in the GSV and varicosities (CEAP C3 to C6) were treated with RFA and USGFS simultaneously, in a single-step procedure, from March 2016 to December 2016. They were followed up at 1 week, 6 months, 1 and 3 years. Clinical outcomes, changes in the Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaires SF-36™, VCSS and AVVQ, evolutive vein occlusion rates were assessed by duplex ultrasound, and ulcer closure was checked.

resultsThe sample was divided into two groups: (Group 1) GSV diameter ≥13.0 mm (median 19.0 [14-24]), 17 subjects, and (Group 2) GSV diameter ≤12.9 mm (median 10.3 [10-12]), 16 subjects. No major adverse event was observed, and the postoperative minor adverse event rates were similar between the two groups. A significant improvement was observed in VCSS and AVVQ from the preoperative levels to the sixth month and the third-year follow-up. Twelve of 13 ulcers had healed at 1 year and remained closed until 3 years. The entire sample had a significant increase in all short form 36 domains, except for mental health in the Group 2 (GSV ≥ 13.0 mm). Overall first week occlusion rate for the whole sample was 90.9% and 69.7% at the 3-year follow-up. No difference in occlusion rate was observed between the two groups at any time.

conclusionExclusively outpatient combined techniques were safe and feasible in this study with no major adverse events, despite the large diameters of the GSV or ulcer presence. Within 3 years, both diameter groups showed equivalent improvement in all QOL parameters, satisfactory axial occlusion, and maintained ulcer closure.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationSclerotherapyAdultAmbulatory CareCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSaphenous VeinTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventionalcatheter ablationquality of lifesaphenous veinsclerotherapyvaricose ulcervaricose veins

Identifiers

PMID34239304
PMCPMC8259833
OpenAlexW3175629833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.