Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239274›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2021

High rate of complete histopathological response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after combined transarterial chemoembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Ulrike Bauer, Sabine Gerum, Falk Roeder, Stefan Münch, Stephanie E Combs, Alexander B Philipp, Enrico N De Toni, Martha M Kirstein, Arndt Vogel, Carolin Mogler and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. No disease left behind.Oncotarget · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrike BauerInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Sabine GerumDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Falk RoederDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.
Stefan MünchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Alexander B PhilippDepartment of Medicine II, Liver Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Enrico N De ToniDepartment of Medicine II, Liver Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Martha M KirsteinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany.
Arndt VogelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany.
Carolin MoglerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Bernhard HallerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Jens NeumannInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Rickmer F BrarenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Philipp PaprottkaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section for Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Markus GubaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section for Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Fabian GeislerInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Roland M SchmidInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Andreas UmgelterInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Ursula EhmerInternal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver transplantation (LT) presents a curative treatment option in patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for resection or ablation therapy. Due to a risk of up 30% for waitlist drop-out upon tumor progression, bridging therapies are used to halt tumor growth. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and less commonly stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or a combination of TACE and SBRT, are used as bridging therapies in LT. However, it remains unclear if one of those treatment options is superior. The analysis of explant livers after transplantation provides the unique opportunity to investigate treatment response by histopathology.

aimTo analyze histopathological response to a combination of TACE and SBRT in HCC in comparison to TACE or SBRT alone.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, 27 patients who received liver transplantation for HCC were analyzed. Patients received either TACE or SBRT alone, or a combination of TACE and SBRT as bridging therapy to liver transplantation. Liver explants of all patients who received at least one TACE and/or SBRT were analyzed for the presence of residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology to assess differences in treatment response to bridging therapies. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-

resultsFourteen patients received TACE only, four patients SBRT only, and nine patients a combination therapy of TACE and SBRT. There were no significant differences between groups regarding age, sex, etiology of underlying liver disease or number and size of tumor lesions. Strikingly, analysis of liver explants revealed that almost all patients in the TACE and SBRT combination group (8/9, 89%) showed no residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology, whereas TACE or SBRT alone resulted in significantly lower rates of complete histopathological response (0/14, 0% and 1/4, 25%, respectively,

conclusionOur data suggests that a combination of TACE and SBRT increases the rate of complete histopathological response compared to TACE or SBRT alone in bridging to liver transplantation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryCombined Modality TherapyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBridging therapyHepatocellular carcinomaLiver transplantationStereotactic body radiation therapyTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID34239274
PMCPMC8240047
OpenAlexW3174244477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.