Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34239227›Full record

ArticleProgress in palliative care2021

Improved Parent-Child Communication following a RCT Evaluating a Legacy Intervention for Children with Advanced Cancer.

Terrah Foster Akard, Mary S Dietrich, Debra L Friedman, Cynthia A Gerhardt, Barbara Given, Verna Hendricks-Ferguson, Pamela S Hinds, Sheila H Ridner, Nicole Beckmann, Mary Jo Gilmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Digital Stories Created by Children With Advanced Cancer.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Terrah Foster AkardVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, USA.
Mary S DietrichVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, USA.
Debra L FriedmanVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
Cynthia A GerhardtThe Ohio State University and The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Barbara GivenMichigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, USA.
Verna Hendricks-FergusonSaint Louis University School of Nursing, St. Louis, USA.
Pamela S HindsChildren's National Health System and The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Sheila H RidnerVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, USA.
Nicole BeckmannVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, USA.
Mary Jo GilmerVanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Refinement and Expansion of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC)U24NR014637 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTNER, JEAN S, POLLAK, KATHRYN I · 2013 to 2017
$9.6M
Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC): Refinement and ExpansionU2CNR014637 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI RITCHIE, CHRISTINE S · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
Impact of a PCRC-Supported Legacy Intervention in Pediatric Palliative CareR01NR015353 · NINR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI AKARD, TERRAH FOSTER · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015353NINR NIH HHS U24 NR014637NINR NIH HHS U2C NR014637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although legacy-building is a priority for quality palliative care, research has rarely examined effects of legacy interventions in children, particularly their impact on parent-child communication.We examined the impact of a web-based legacy intervention on parent-child communication. We hypothesized that compared to usual care, legacy-making would improve quality of parent-child communication.Between 2015 and 2018, Facebook advertisements were used to recruit families of children (ages 7-17) with relapsed/refractory cancer. Parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care group. The intervention website guided children to create digital storyboards over 2 weeks by directing them to answer legacy questions about themselves and upload photographs, videos, and music. Families received a copy of the child's final digital story. Children and parents completed the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). Linear regressions tested for differences in change from T1 to T2 between the groups controlling for T1 values using an alpha of p < .05. Intervention effects were measured using Cohen's

Indexed as

cancerfamily relationshipsfather-child relationshippalliative careparent-child communicationparent-child relationshippediatricweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID34239227
PMCPMC8259556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.