ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2021
Bayesian Structure Learning in Multi-layered Genomic Networks.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian estimation of covariate assisted principal regression for brain functional connectivity.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Multiscale networks in Alzheimer's disease identify brain hypometabolism as central across biological scales.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Covariance Assisted Multivariate Penalized Additive Regression (CoMPAdRe).Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2025Article
- Time-varying dynamic Bayesian network learning for an fMRI study of emotion processing.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Multiscale networks in multiple sclerosis.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A generalized likelihood-based Bayesian approach for scalable joint regression and covariance selection in high dimensions.Statistics and computing · 2022Article
- Probabilistic edge inference of gene networks with markov random field-based bayesian learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Bayesian Edge Regression in Undirected Graphical Models to Characterize Interpatient Heterogeneity in Cancer.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2022Article
- Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.Statistical methods & applications · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Integrative network modeling of data arising from multiple genomic platforms provides insight into the holistic picture of the interactive system, as well as the flow of information across many disease domains including cancer. The basic data structure consists of a sequence of hierarchically ordered datasets for each individual subject, which facilitates integration of diverse inputs, such as genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data. A primary analytical task in such contexts is to model the layered architecture of networks where the vertices can be naturally partitioned into ordered layers, dictated by multiple platforms, and exhibit both undirected and directed relationships. We propose a multi-layered Gaussian graphical model (mlGGM) to investigate conditional independence structures in such multi-level genomic networks in human cancers. We implement a Bayesian node-wise selection (BANS) approach based on variable selection techniques that coherently accounts for the multiple types of dependencies in mlGGM; this flexible strategy exploits edge-specific prior knowledge and selects sparse and interpretable models. Through simulated data generated under various scenarios, we demonstrate that BANS outperforms other existing multivariate regression-based methodologies. Our integrative genomic network analysis for key signaling pathways across multiple cancer types highlights commonalities and differences of p53 integrative networks and epigenetic effects of BRCA2 on p53 and its interaction with T68 phosphorylated CHK2, that may have translational utilities of finding biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.