Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238923›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Optimizing prediction of response to antidepressant medications using machine learning and integrated genetic, clinical, and demographic data.

Dekel Taliaz, Amit Spinrad, Ran Barzilay, Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki, Dana Averbuch, Omri Teltsh, Roy Schurr, Sne Darki-Morag, Bernard Lerer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05137197 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05137197 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind (Subject and Rater) Controlled Study to Confirm the Effectiveness of Predictix Genetics Antidepressant -Guided Treatment in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaliaz Ltd.Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled354ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsPredictix Genetics Antidepressant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dekel TaliazTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel. dekel@taliazhealth.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8886-2136
Amit SpinradTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-6464
Ran BarzilayLifespan Brain Institute, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zohar Barnett-ItzhakiTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-9397
Dana AverbuchTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Omri TeltshTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-809X
Roy SchurrTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-0821
Sne Darki-MoragTaliaz, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bernard LererBiological Psychiatry Laboratory, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. lerer@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-632X

Funding

Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Drug Metabolizing EnzymesU19GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, LIEWEI, WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2010 to 2014
$15.8M
TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION-278990003N01MH090003 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 1999 to 2003
–
European Commission (EC) 832230NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061388NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH090003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is complex and multifactorial, posing a major challenge of tailoring the optimal medication for each patient. Current practice for MDD treatment mainly relies on trial and error, with an estimated 42-53% response rates for antidepressant use. Here, we sought to generate an accurate predictor of response to a panel of antidepressants and optimize treatment selection using a data-driven approach analyzing combinations of genetic, clinical, and demographic factors. We analyzed the response patterns of patients to three antidepressant medications in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, and employed state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) tools to generate a predictive algorithm. To validate our results, we assessed the algorithm's capacity to predict individualized antidepressant responses on a separate set of 530 patients in STAR*D, consisting of 271 patients in a validation set and 259 patients in the final test set. This assessment yielded an average balanced accuracy rate of 72.3% (SD 8.1) and 70.1% (SD 6.8) across the different medications in the validation and test set, respectively (p < 0.01 for all models). To further validate our design scheme, we obtained data from the Pharmacogenomic Research Network Antidepressant Medication Pharmacogenomic Study (PGRN-AMPS) of patients treated with citalopram, and applied the algorithm's citalopram model. This external validation yielded highly similar results for STAR*D and PGRN-AMPS test sets, with a balanced accuracy of 60.5% and 61.3%, respectively (both p's < 0.01). These findings support the feasibility of using ML algorithms applied to large datasets with genetic, clinical, and demographic features to improve accuracy in antidepressant prescription.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramDemographyHumansMachine LearningTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsCitalopram

Identifiers

PMID34238923
PMCPMC8266902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.