ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021
Optimizing prediction of response to antidepressant medications using machine learning and integrated genetic, clinical, and demographic data.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05137197 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind (Subject and Rater) Controlled Study to Confirm the Effectiveness of Predictix Genetics Antidepressant -Guided Treatment in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine Learning for Comparative Antidepressant Selection in Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.BMJ mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive Characterization of Antidepressant Pharmacogenetics: A Systematic Review of Studies in Major Depressive Disorder.Clinical and translational science · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning and Pharmacogenomics at the Time of Precision Psychiatry.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- A genetic risk score to predict treatment nonresponse in psychotic depression.Translational psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Blood Fatty Acid Profile as a Predictor of Antidepressant Efficacy-A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Data driven versus standard practice policies for personalized antidepressant treatment: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Treatment in Psychiatry.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Personalizing Antidepressant Therapy: Integrating Pharmacogenomics, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, and Digital Tools for Improved Depression Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Machine learning models incorporating genotype and ancestry improve severe asthma risk prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing paroxetine treatment in depression: predicting remission and plasma concentration, and validating and updating therapeutic reference ranges.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Graph Representation Learning for the Prediction of Medication Usage in the UK Biobank Based on Pharmacogenetic Variants.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience: Transformative Synergies in Brain Research and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- AI and mental health: evaluating supervised machine learning models trained on diagnostic classifications.AI & society · 2025Article
- Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methodologies for Predicting the Non-Specific Treatment Response in Placebo Controlled Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Trials.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Antidepressant Treatment Response Prediction With Early Assessment of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Micro-RNA.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- The role of gut microbiota and metabolomic pathways in modulating the efficacy of SSRIs for major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is complex and multifactorial, posing a major challenge of tailoring the optimal medication for each patient. Current practice for MDD treatment mainly relies on trial and error, with an estimated 42-53% response rates for antidepressant use. Here, we sought to generate an accurate predictor of response to a panel of antidepressants and optimize treatment selection using a data-driven approach analyzing combinations of genetic, clinical, and demographic factors. We analyzed the response patterns of patients to three antidepressant medications in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, and employed state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) tools to generate a predictive algorithm. To validate our results, we assessed the algorithm's capacity to predict individualized antidepressant responses on a separate set of 530 patients in STAR*D, consisting of 271 patients in a validation set and 259 patients in the final test set. This assessment yielded an average balanced accuracy rate of 72.3% (SD 8.1) and 70.1% (SD 6.8) across the different medications in the validation and test set, respectively (p < 0.01 for all models). To further validate our design scheme, we obtained data from the Pharmacogenomic Research Network Antidepressant Medication Pharmacogenomic Study (PGRN-AMPS) of patients treated with citalopram, and applied the algorithm's citalopram model. This external validation yielded highly similar results for STAR*D and PGRN-AMPS test sets, with a balanced accuracy of 60.5% and 61.3%, respectively (both p's < 0.01). These findings support the feasibility of using ML algorithms applied to large datasets with genetic, clinical, and demographic features to improve accuracy in antidepressant prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.