Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238721›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2021

Temporal trends and forecasting of COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths in Scotland using a national real-time patient-level data platform: a statistical modelling study.

Colin R Simpson, Chris Robertson, Eleftheria Vasileiou, Emily Moore, Colin McCowan, Utkarsh Agrawal, Helen R Stagg, Annemarie Docherty, Rachel Mulholland, Josephine L K Murray and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Colin R SimpsonSchool of Health, Wellington Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand; Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: colin.simpson@vuw.ac.nz.
Chris RobertsonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK; Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Eleftheria VasileiouUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; HDR UK BREATHE Hub, Edinburgh, UK.
Emily MoorePublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Colin McCowanSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Utkarsh AgrawalSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Helen R StaggUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Annemarie DochertyUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel MulhollandUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Josephine L K MurrayPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Lewis D RitchieCentre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jim McMenaminPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; HDR UK BREATHE Hub, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19004Medical Research Council MC_PC_19075Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058Medical Research Council MR/R008345/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic continues, national-level surveillance platforms with real-time individual person-level data are required to monitor and predict the epidemiological and clinical profile of COVID-19 and inform public health policy. We aimed to create a national dataset of patient-level data in Scotland to identify temporal trends and COVID-19 risk factors, and to develop a novel statistical prediction model to forecast COVID-19-related deaths and hospitalisations during the second wave.

methodsWe established a surveillance platform to monitor COVID-19 temporal trends using person-level primary care data (including age, sex, socioeconomic status, urban or rural residence, care home residence, and clinical risk factors) linked to data on SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests, hospitalisations, and deaths for all individuals resident in Scotland who were registered with a general practice on Feb 23, 2020. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between clinical risk groups and time to hospitalisation and death. A survival prediction model derived from data from March 1 to June 23, 2020, was created to forecast hospital admissions and deaths from October to December, 2020. We fitted a generalised additive spline model to daily SARS-CoV-2 cases over the previous 10 weeks and used this to create a 28-day forecast of the number of daily cases. The age and risk group pattern of cases in the previous 3 weeks was then used to select a stratified sample of individuals from our cohort who had not previously tested positive, with future cases in each group sampled from a multinomial distribution. We then used their patient characteristics (including age, sex, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status) to predict their probability of hospitalisation or death.

findingsOur cohort included 5 384 819 people, representing 98·6% of the entire estimated population residing in Scotland during 2020. Hospitalisation and death among those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 1 and June 23, 2020, were associated with several patient characteristics, including male sex (hospitalisation hazard ratio [HR] 1·47, 95% CI 1·38-1·57; death HR 1·62, 1·49-1·76) and various comorbidities, with the highest hospitalisation HR found for transplantation (4·53, 1·87-10·98) and the highest death HR for myoneural disease (2·33, 1·46-3·71). For those testing positive, there were decreasing temporal trends in hospitalisation and death rates. The proportion of positive tests among older age groups (>40 years) and those with at-risk comorbidities increased during October, 2020. On Nov 10, 2020, the projected number of hospitalisations for Dec 8, 2020 (28 days later) was 90 per day (95% prediction interval 55-125) and the projected number of deaths was 21 per day (12-29).

interpretationThe estimated incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on positive tests recorded in this unique data resource has provided forecasts of hospitalisation and death rates for the whole of Scotland. These findings were used by the Scottish Government to inform their response to reduce COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality.

fundingMedical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, Health Data Research UK, Scottish Government Director General Health and Social Care.

Indexed as

COVID-19ForecastingHospitalizationModels, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID34238721
PMCPMC8257056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.