Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238573›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2021

Universal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction screening and assisted reproductive technology in a coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic epicenter: screening and cycle outcomes from a New York City fertility center.

Jacquelyn Shaw, Jessica Tozour, Jennifer K Blakemore, James Grifo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oocyte Retrieval in Asymptomatic Patients Positive for SARS-CoV-2.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacquelyn ShawNew York University Langone Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York, New York. Electronic address: jacquelyn.shaw@nyulangone.org.
Jessica TozourNew York University Langone Hospital - Long Island, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mineola, New York.
Jennifer K BlakemoreNew York University Langone Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York, New York.
James GrifoNew York University Langone Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York, New York.
New Hope Fertility Center · USIsland Hospital · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and efficacy of a universal screening program in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS).

designSingle-center retrospective cohort study.

settingAcademic fertility center in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENT(S): All patients undergoing COS from June 17, 2019, to February 28, 2021. INTERVENTION(S): Universal COVID-19 screening starting June 17, 2020, with SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing within 5 days of oocyte retrieval, patient-reported symptom screening, and temperature monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the number of positive COVID-19 cases in patients undergoing COS cycles. The secondary outcomes were cycle outcomes compared with before COVID-19 COS cycles, adverse outcomes in COVID-canceled cycles, and center-specific COVID-19 detection rates compared with New York City cases. RESULT(S): From June 17, 2020, to February 28, 2021, 1,696 COS cycles were initiated with only seven positive COVID-19 cases for an overall positivity rate of 0.4%. When compared with before COVID cycles from June 17, 2019, to February 28, 2020, the volume of COS cycles were higher, while the overall cycle cancelation rate was lower during COVID-19. Cycle outcomes including oocyte yield and blast utilization rates were unchanged from pre-COVID cycles. Cases of COVID-19, while very low, occurred more frequently during surges in New York City rates. CONCLUSION(S): Assisted reproductive technology can be performed during the COVID-19 pandemic utilizing frequent universal screening and safe practices with low SARS-CoV-2 positivity, low cycle cancelation rates, and positive patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleFertile PeriodFertility ClinicsHumansMass ScreeningNew York CityPandemicsPolymerase Chain ReactionReproductive Techniques, AssistedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2controlled ovarian stimulationCOVID-19universal screening

Identifiers

PMID34238573
PMCPMC8166514
OpenAlexW3172271737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.