Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238547›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2021

Communication failures contributing to patient injury in anaesthesia malpractice claims☆.

Rachel N Douglas, Linda S Stephens, Karen L Posner, Joanna M Davies, Shawn L Mincer, Amanda R Burden, Karen B Domino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Handoffs in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel N DouglasDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linda S StephensDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Karen L PosnerDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joanna M DaviesDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shawn L MincerDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda R BurdenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Karen B DominoDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: kdomino@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USCooper University Hospital · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
INSTITUTE FOR TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH SCIENCE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025014 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$51.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication amongst team members is critical to providing safe, effective medical care. We investigated the role of communication failures in patient injury using the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database.

methodsClaims associated with surgical/procedural and obstetric anaesthesia and postoperative pain management for adverse events from 2004 or later were included. Communication was defined as transfer of information between two or more parties. Failure was defined as communication that was incomplete, inaccurate, absent, or not timely. We classified root causes of failures as content, audience, purpose, or occasion with inter-rater reliability assessed by kappa. Claims with communication failures contributing to injury (injury-related communication failures; n=389) were compared with claims without any communication failures (n=521) using Fisher's exact test, t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-tests.

resultsAt least one communication failure contributing to patient injury occurred in 43% (n=389) out of 910 claims (κ=0.885). Patients in claims with injury-related communication failures were similar to patients in claims without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings (34% vs 26%; P=0.004). Fifty-two claims had multiple communication failures for a total of 446 injury-related failures, and 47% of failures occurred during surgery, 28% preoperatively, and 23% postoperatively. Content failures (insufficient, inaccurate, or no information transmitted) accounted for 60% of the 446 communication failures.

conclusionsCommunication failure contributed to patient injury in 43% of anaesthesia malpractice claims. Patient/case characteristics in claims with communication failures were similar to those without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationMalpracticeMedical ErrorsPatient Care TeamPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional-Family RelationsAdultAgedAnalgesiaAnesthesiaAnesthesia, ObstetricalDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInsurance, LiabilityMaleclosed claimscommunication errorcommunicationsliabilitypatient injurypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID34238547
PMCPMC8563338
OpenAlexW3181213720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.