ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2021
COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS countries and its association with socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gini coefficient, GDP per capita and COVID-19 mortality: a systematic review of ecologic studies.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Exploring the Role of Genetic Diversity and Cultural Norms in COVID-19 Vulnerability: A Global Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Governance and responses of health and surveillance systems to COVID-19 in BRICS countries: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- [BRICS in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study on social distancing and vaccination measures in the nations of the bloc].Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Effects of air pollution on global health: evidence from the global burden of disease study in the BRICS countries.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- "The COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS: Milestones, interventions, and molecular epidemiology".PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Future health expenditure in the BRICS countries: a forecasting analysis for 2035.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Cohort Profile: Real-Time Insights of COVID-19 in India (RTI COVID-India).BMC public health · 2023Article
- A Comparative Analysis on the Social Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage in Fragile and Conflict Affected Settings and Non-fragile and Conflict Affected Settings.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health services utilization in China: A nationwide longitudinal study.Global transitions · 2023Article
- Were public interventions relevant for containing the covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020?Revista de saude publica · 2023Article
- Article
- Locked Down: Economic and Health Effects of COVID-19 Response on Residents of a South African Township.Global social welfare : research, policy & practice · 2022Article
- Emerging Viral Infections, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2022Review
- Human Development Index Is Associated with COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in Brazil: An Ecological Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Comparing different machine learning techniques for predicting COVID-19 severity.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Article
- The Dynamic COVID-Zero Strategy in China.China CDC weekly · 2022Article
- Health disparity and mortality trends of infectious diseases in BRICS from 1990 to 2019.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Tracking the emergence of disparities in the subnational spread of COVID-19 in Brazil using an online application for real-time data visualisation: A longitudinal analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle attention has been paid to the comparison of COVID-19 pandemic responses and related factors in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries. We aimed at evaluating the association of daily new COVID-19 cases with socio-economic and demographic factors, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response in BRICS countries.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using data on the COVID-19 pandemic and other indicators of BRICS countries from February 26, 2020 to April 30, 2021. We compared COVID-19 epidemic in BRICS countries and analyzed related factors by log-linear Generalized Additive Model (GAM) models.
resultsIn BRICS countries, India had the highest totally of confirmed cases with 18.76 million, followed by Brazil (14.45 million), Russia (4.81 million), and South Africa (1.58 million), while China (0.10 million) had the lowest figure. South Africa had the lowest rate of administered vaccine doses (0.18 million) among BRICS countries as of April 30, 2021. In the GAM model, a 1 unit increase in population density and policy stringency index was associated with a 5.17% and 1.95% growth in daily new COVID-19 cases (P < 0.001), respectively. Exposure-response curves for the effects of policy stringency index on daily new cases showed that there was a rapid surge in number of daily new COVID-19 cases when the index ranged from 0 to 45. The number of infections climbed slowly when the index ranged from 46 to 80, and decreased when the index was above 80 (P < 0.001). In addition, daily new COVID-19 cases (all P < 0.001) were also correlated with life expectancy at birth (-1.61%), extreme poverty (8.95%), human development index (-0.05%), GDP per capita (-0.18%), diabetes prevalence (0.66%), proportion of population aged 60 and above (2.23%), hospital beds per thousand people (-0.08%), proportion of people with access to improved drinking water (-7.40%), prevalence of open defecation (0.69%), and annual tourist/visitor arrivals (0.003%), after controlling other confounders. Different lag structures showed similar results in the sensitivity analysis.
conclusionsStrong policy response is crucial to control the pandemic, such as effective containment and case management. Our findings also highlighted the importance of reducing socio-economic inequalities and strengthening the resilience of health systems to better respond to public health emergencies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.