Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238365›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Psychometric properties of medication adherence instruments in cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review protocol.

Henrique Ceretta Oliveira, Daisuke Hayashi Neto, Samantha Dalbosco Lins Carvalho, Rita de Cássia Lopes Barros, Mayza Luzia Dos Santos Neves, Carla Renata Silva Andrechuk, Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre, Roberta Cunha Matheus Rodrigues

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henrique Ceretta OliveiraSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil. hceretta@unicamp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-8190-0718
Daisuke Hayashi NetoSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Samantha Dalbosco Lins CarvalhoSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Lopes BarrosSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Mayza Luzia Dos Santos NevesSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Carla Renata Silva AndrechukSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Neusa Maria Costa AlexandreSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Roberta Cunha Matheus RodriguesSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (Unicamp), 126 Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-887, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.; however, most patients do not adhere to the treatment. There are several self-reported measures for assessing medication adherence. Identifying the instruments with the best psychometric evidence is essential for selecting an accurate measure. The aim of this study is to critically assess, compare and synthesize the quality of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures to access medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

methodsThis protocol is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The following databases will be searched: Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO and ProQuest. DISCUSSION: This review will provide a detailed assessment of the measurement properties of self-reported medication adherence instruments in patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus to support clinical practice and research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019129109.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansMedication AdherenceMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychometricsSystematic Reviews as TopicCardiovascular diseasesDiabetes mellitusMedication adherencePatient reported outcome measuresPsychometricsReproducibility of resultstype 2

Identifiers

PMID34238365
PMCPMC8268561
OpenAlexW3130339877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.