Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238354›Full record

ArticleSkeletal muscle2021

mRNP granule proteins Fmrp and Dcp1a differentially regulate mRNP complexes to contribute to control of muscle stem cell quiescence and activation.

Nainita Roy, Swetha Sundar, Malini Pillai, Farah Patell-Socha, Sravya Ganesh, Ajoy Aloysius, Mohammed Rumman, Hardik Gala, Simon M Hughes, Peter S Zammit and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nainita Roy *Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Swetha Sundar *Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.
Malini Pillai *Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Farah Patell-Socha *Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Sravya GaneshInstitute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Ajoy AloysiusNational Center for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Mohammed RummanInstitute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Hardik GalaInstitute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India.
Simon M HughesKing's College London, Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Peter S ZammitKing's College London, Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
Jyotsna DhawanInstitute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, India. jdhawan@ccmb.res.in.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-7418
Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · INCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · INKing's College London · GBManipal Academy of Higher Education · INNational Centre for Biological Sciences · IN

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G1001029Medical Research Council MR/N021231/1Medical Research Council MR/P023215/1Medical Research Council MR/S002472/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring skeletal muscle regeneration, satellite stem cells use distinct pathways to repair damaged myofibers or to self-renew by returning to quiescence. Cellular/mitotic quiescence employs mechanisms that promote a poised or primed state, including altered RNA turnover and translational repression. Here, we investigate the role of mRNP granule proteins Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (Fmrp) and Decapping protein 1a (Dcp1a) in muscle stem cell quiescence and differentiation.

methodsUsing isolated single muscle fibers from adult mice, we established differential enrichment of mRNP granule proteins including Fmrp and Dcp1a in muscle stem cells vs. myofibers. We investigated muscle tissue homeostasis in adult Fmr1-/- mice, analyzing myofiber cross-sectional area in vivo and satellite cell proliferation ex vivo. We explored the molecular mechanisms of Dcp1a and Fmrp function in quiescence, proliferation and differentiation in a C2C12 culture model. Here, we used polysome profiling, imaging and RNA/protein expression analysis to establish the abundance and assembly status of mRNP granule proteins in different cellular states, and the phenotype of knockdown cells.

resultsQuiescent muscle satellite cells are enriched for puncta containing the translational repressor Fmrp, but not the mRNA decay factor Dcp1a. MuSC isolated from Fmr1

conclusionsTaken together, our results provide evidence that the balance of mRNA turnover versus utilization is specific for distinct cellular states.

Indexed as

Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1MyoblastsRibonucleoproteinsAnimalsEndoribonucleasesMiceMice, KnockoutMuscle Fibers, SkeletalStem CellsTrans-ActivatorsEndoribonucleasesFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1messenger ribonucleoproteinRibonucleoproteinssmad4-interacting protein SMIF, mouseTrans-ActivatorsDcp1aFmr1 knockoutFmrpG0mRNA decaymRNP granuleMuscle stem cellMyoblastQuiescenceSkeletal muscleTranslational control

Identifiers

PMID34238354
PMCPMC8265057
OpenAlexW3177623751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.