Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238352›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2021

High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer refined with single-cell RNA sequencing: specific cell subtypes influence survival and determine molecular subtype classification.

Siel Olbrecht, Pieter Busschaert, Junbin Qian, Adriaan Vanderstichele, Liselore Loverix, Toon Van Gorp, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Sileny Han, Annick Van den Broeck, An Coosemans and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. B cells in cancer: functions, mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Siel OlbrechtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. siel.olbrecht@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-5905
Pieter BusschaertDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Junbin QianVIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Adriaan VandersticheleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Liselore LoverixDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Toon Van GorpDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Els Van NieuwenhuysenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sileny HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Annick Van den BroeckDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
An CoosemansDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anne-Sophie Van RompuyDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Diether LambrechtsVIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium. diether.lambrechts@kuleuven.be.
Ignace VergoteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BEThe European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC) is characterised by extensive inter- and intratumour heterogeneity, resulting in persistent therapeutic resistance and poor disease outcome. Molecular subtype classification based on bulk RNA sequencing facilitates a more accurate characterisation of this heterogeneity, but the lack of strong prognostic or predictive correlations with these subtypes currently hinders their clinical implementation. Stromal admixture profoundly affects the prognostic impact of the molecular subtypes, but the contribution of stromal cells to each subtype has poorly been characterised. Increasing the transcriptomic resolution of the molecular subtypes based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) may provide insights in the prognostic and predictive relevance of these subtypes.

methodsWe performed scRNA-seq of 18,403 cells unbiasedly collected from 7 treatment-naive HGSTOC tumours. For each phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells, we identified specific transcriptomic markers. We explored which phenotypic clusters correlated with overall survival based on expression of these transcriptomic markers in microarray data of 1467 tumours. By evaluating molecular subtype signatures in single cells, we assessed to what extent a phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells contributes to each molecular subtype.

resultsWe identified 11 cancer and 32 stromal cell phenotypes in HGSTOC tumours. Of these, the relative frequency of myofibroblasts, TGF-β-driven cancer-associated fibroblasts, mesothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial cells predicted poor outcome, while plasma cells correlated with more favourable outcome. Moreover, we identified a clear cell-like transcriptomic signature in cancer cells, which correlated with worse overall survival in HGSTOC patients. Stromal cell phenotypes differed substantially between molecular subtypes. For instance, the mesenchymal, immunoreactive and differentiated signatures were characterised by specific fibroblast, immune cell and myofibroblast/mesothelial cell phenotypes, respectively. Cell phenotypes correlating with poor outcome were enriched in molecular subtypes associated with poor outcome.

conclusionsWe used scRNA-seq to identify stromal cell phenotypes predicting overall survival in HGSTOC patients. These stromal features explain the association of the molecular subtypes with outcome but also the latter's weakness of clinical implementation. Stratifying patients based on marker genes specific for these phenotypes represents a promising approach to predict prognosis or response to therapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorCell CommunicationComputational BiologyCytokinesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoglobulin GMeta-Analysis as TopicMolecular Sequence AnnotationBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesImmunoglobulin GHigh-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancerMolecular subtypesOverall survivalPrognosisSingle-cell RNA sequencingStromal heterogeneityTranscriptomic markersTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34238352
PMCPMC8268616
OpenAlexW3178934170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.