Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238306›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2021

Pharmacist attitudes and provision of harm reduction services in North Carolina: an exploratory study.

Rachel A Parry, William A Zule, Christopher B Hurt, Donna M Evon, Sarah K Rhea, Delesha M Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medicine and Pharmacy Students' Role in Decreasing Substance Use Disorder Stigma: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Factors associated with perceived ease of access to syringes in Appalachian North Carolina.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel A ParryUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7355, USA. rparry@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-6468
William A ZuleRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Christopher B HurtInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, CB#7030, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7030, USA.
Donna M EvonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sarah K RheaRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Delesha M CarpenterUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7355, USA.

Funding

Mitigating the Outcomes Associated with the Injection Drug Use Epidemic in Southern AppalachiaUG3DA044823 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ZULE, WILLIAM A · 2017 to 2018
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists are among the most accessible healthcare providers in the United States and uniquely positioned to provide harm reduction services. The availability of pharmacy-based harm reduction services and pharmacist attitudes toward delivering these services have been understudied to date. We examine North Carolina (NC) pharmacists' experiences with and attitudes about harm reduction services and explore differences between rural and urban pharmacists.

methodsA convenience sample of NC pharmacists participated in an anonymous, online survey regarding harm reduction services: non-prescription syringe sales; naloxone dispensing; and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening. Urban-rural differences were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically.

resultsThree hundred pharmacists responded to the survey; 68 (23%) practiced in rural counties. Dispensing non-prescription syringes and naloxone at least occasionally was reported by 77% (n = 231) and 88% (n = 263) pharmacists, respectively. Pharmacy-delivered HIV or HCV screening was rare. Urban pharmacists dispensed naloxone more frequently than rural pharmacies (p = 0.04). Only 52% of pharmacists agreed that persons who inject drugs should always be allowed to buy non-prescription syringes. Rural pharmacists' attitudes toward harm reduction services for persons who inject drugs were statistically, though marginally, less supportive when compared to urban pharmacists' attitudes. The most common barrier to non-prescription syringe access was requiring patients to provide proof of prescription injection medication use, which 21% of pharmacists reported was required by their pharmacy's policy on non-prescription syringe sales.

conclusionsAlthough most pharmacies distributed naloxone and sold non-prescription syringes, pharmacy store policies and personal beliefs inhibited naloxone and non-prescription syringe dispensing. NC community pharmacies infrequently offer HIV and HCV screening. Paired with disseminating the evidence of the positive impact of harm reduction on individual and public health outcomes to NC pharmacists, institutional and systems changes to practice and policy may be important to promote harm reduction service availability, particularly for rural NC residents.

trial registrationN/A.

Indexed as

Drug UsersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAttitude of Health PersonnelHarm ReductionHumansNorth CarolinaPharmacistsCommunity pharmacy servicesHarm reductionHepatitis CHIVIntravenousNaloxoneSubstance abuseSyringes

Identifiers

PMID34238306
PMCPMC8265050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.