Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238270›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Newspaper coverage of food insecurity in UK, 2016-2019: a multi-method analysis.

Amy Yau, Hardeep Singh-Lalli, Hannah Forde, Matthew Keeble, Martin White, Jean Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy YauCentre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. amy.yau@lshtm.ac.uk.
Hardeep Singh-LalliCentre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hannah Forde *Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew Keeble *Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Martin WhiteCentre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jean AdamsCentre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_UU_00006/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/6Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome Trust 087636/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity is a growing concern in the UK. Newspaper coverage can reflect and shape public and political views. We examined how frequently food insecurity was reported on in UK newspapers, how the problem and its drivers were described, and which solutions were proposed.

methodsUsing Factiva, we searched for news articles that were substantively about food insecurity and published in national UK newspapers between 01 January 2016 and 11 June 2019. We examined whether the number of articles differed over the study period, and conducted a thematic analysis to theoretical saturation using a random sample of articles.

resultsOverall, 436 articles met our inclusion criteria and 132 (30%) were analysed thematically. Reporting was more prevalent in the summer, with mentions of 'holiday hunger' among children, and leading up to Christmas, when charity was encouraged. Articles often contained views from advocacy groups and charities, who appeared to play an important role in maintaining news interest in food insecurity. From the thematic analysis, we developed themes related to the problems ('definitions of food insecurity' and 'consequences of food insecurity for individuals'), drivers ('insufficient income as an immediate driver' and 'government versus individual responsibility'), and solutions ('charitable food aid' and 'calls for government action'). The problem of food insecurity was often defined by food bank use or hunger, but other definitions and a range of consequences for individuals were acknowledged. Articles identified government as a driver of food insecurity, especially in relation to the roll-out of Universal Credit. Few articles proposed individual failings as a driver of food insecurity. The reported existing solutions predominantly focused on food banking and redistributing 'food waste'. The public, charities, and individuals experiencing food insecurity were generally portrayed as supportive of government action to tackle food insecurity. However, contention within government regarding the extent of food insecurity, governmental responsibility and potential solutions was reported.

conclusionsFood insecurity was a topic of significant interest within UK newspapers. Newspapers were used to call for government action and advocate for structural, income-based solutions.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityRefuse DisposalChildFoodHumansPovertyUnited KingdomFood insecurityFood povertyFrequency analysisMedia analysisNewspaperThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID34238270
PMCPMC8268386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.