Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238248›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer, with differences between proximal and distal colon cancer: a prospective cohort study of diagnostic accuracy in primary care.

Knut Holtedahl, Lars Borgquist, Gé A Donker, Frank Buntinx, David Weller, Christine Campbell, Jörgen Månsson, Victoria Hammersley, Tonje Braaten, Ranjan Parajuli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Psycho-education Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Association between smoking and colorectal cancer in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Symptom network in patients with colorectal cancer during the perioperative period.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of Cancer · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Knut HoltedahlDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Breivika, Tromsø, Norway. knut.holtedahl@uit.no.
Lars BorgquistDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Gé A DonkerNetherlands Institute of Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118, Utrecht, 3513, the Netherlands.
Frank BuntinxDepartment of General Practice, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
David WellerUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Christine CampbellUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Jörgen MånssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine/Primary Health Care, University of Gothenburg, Box 100, 40530, Gothenburgh, Sweden.
Victoria HammersleyUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Tonje BraatenDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Breivika, Tromsø, Norway.
Ranjan ParajuliFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, P.O.Box 1490, 8049, Bodø, Norway.
University of Edinburgh · GBUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOLinköping University · SEMaastricht University · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLNord University · NOUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an abdominal symptom study in primary care in six European countries, 511 cases of cancer were recorded prospectively among 61,802 patients 16 years and older in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium and Scotland. Colorectal cancer is one of the main types of cancer associated with abdominal symptoms; hence, an in-depth subgroup analysis of the 94 colorectal cancers was carried out in order to study variation in symptom presentation among cancers in different anatomical locations.

methodInitial data capture was by completion of standardised forms containing closed questions about symptoms recorded during the consultation. Follow-up data were provided by the GP after diagnosis, based on medical record data made after the consultation. GPs also provided free text comments about the diagnostic procedure for individual patients. Fisher's exact test was used to analyse differences between groups.

resultsAlmost all symptoms recorded could indicate colorectal cancer. 'Rectal bleeding' had a specificity of 99.4% and a PPV of 4.0%. Faecal occult blood in stool (FOBT) or anaemia may indicate gastrointestinal bleeding: when these symptoms and signs were combined, sensitivity reached 57.5%, with 69.2% for cancer in the distal colon. For proximal colon cancers, none of 18 patients had 'Rectal bleeding' at the initial consultation, but three of the 18 did so at a later consultation. 'Abdominal pain, lower part', 'Constipation' and 'Distended abdomen, bloating' were less specific and also less sensitive than 'Rectal bleeding', and with PPV between 0.7% and 1.9%.

conclusionsApart from rectal bleeding, single symptoms did not reach the PPV 3% NICE threshold. However, supplementary information such as a positive FOBT or persistent symptoms may revise the PPV upwards. If a colorectal cancer is suspected by the GP despite few symptoms, the total clinical picture may still reach the NICE PPV threshold of 3% and justify a specific referral.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansOccult BloodPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesColorectal cancerDiagnostic accuracyEarly diagnosisFamily medicineGeneral practiceNeoplasmsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID34238248
PMCPMC8268573
OpenAlexW3177557497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.