Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238207›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

SCOUR: a stepwise machine learning framework for predicting metabolite-dependent regulatory interactions.

Justin Y Lee, Britney Nguyen, Carlos Orosco, Mark P Styczynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin Y LeeSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Britney NguyenSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carlos OroscoSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark P StyczynskiSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. mark.styczynski@chbe.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-6658

Funding

Modeling metabolic dynamics and regulation in biological systemsR35GM119701 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STYCZYNSKI, MARK PHILIP-WALTER · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
National Science Foundation 1254382NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119701NIH HHS R35-GM119701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe topology of metabolic networks is both well-studied and remarkably well-conserved across many species. The regulation of these networks, however, is much more poorly characterized, though it is known to be divergent across organisms-two characteristics that make it difficult to model metabolic networks accurately. While many computational methods have been built to unravel transcriptional regulation, there have been few approaches developed for systems-scale analysis and study of metabolic regulation. Here, we present a stepwise machine learning framework that applies established algorithms to identify regulatory interactions in metabolic systems based on metabolic data: stepwise classification of unknown regulation, or SCOUR.

resultsWe evaluated our framework on both noiseless and noisy data, using several models of varying sizes and topologies to show that our approach is generalizable. We found that, when testing on data under the most realistic conditions (low sampling frequency and high noise), SCOUR could identify reaction fluxes controlled only by the concentration of a single metabolite (its primary substrate) with high accuracy. The positive predictive value (PPV) for identifying reactions controlled by the concentration of two metabolites ranged from 32 to 88% for noiseless data, 9.2 to 49% for either low sampling frequency/low noise or high sampling frequency/high noise data, and 6.6-27% for low sampling frequency/high noise data, with results typically sufficiently high for lab validation to be a practical endeavor. While the PPVs for reactions controlled by three metabolites were lower, they were still in most cases significantly better than random classification.

conclusionsSCOUR uses a novel approach to synthetically generate the training data needed to identify regulators of reaction fluxes in a given metabolic system, enabling metabolomics and fluxomics data to be leveraged for regulatory structure inference. By identifying and triaging the most likely candidate regulatory interactions, SCOUR can drastically reduce the amount of time needed to identify and experimentally validate metabolic regulatory interactions. As high-throughput experimental methods for testing these interactions are further developed, SCOUR will provide critical impact in the development of predictive metabolic models in new organisms and pathways.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetabolic Networks and PathwaysAlgorithmsGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksMetabolomicsAllosteric regulationFluxomicsMachine learningMetabolomicsRegulatory interactions

Identifiers

PMID34238207
PMCPMC8268592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.