Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238049›Full record

SynthesisJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2021

Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium.

Gustavo H Vázquez, Anees Bahji, Juan Undurraga, Leonardo Tondo, Ross J Baldessarini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05814640 (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Adolescent Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05814640 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Adolescent Depression (STAR-AD): a Pragmatic Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled520ConditionsDepression, SequestraArmsFluoxetine, Sertraline, Vortioxetine, Duloxetine, Aripiprazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Lithium and its impact on renal function. Recommendations for practice, especially for older patients].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gustavo H VázquezInternational Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-3336
Anees BahjiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Juan UndurragaInternational Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Leonardo TondoInternational Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Ross J BaldessariniInternational Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorder Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USQueen's University · CAUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, and failures ("treatment-resistant depression" [TRD]) are frequent. Steps to address TRD include increasing antidepressant dose, combining antidepressants, adding adjunctive agents, or using nonpharmacological treatments. Their

methodsWe reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials and used random-effects meta-analysis to compare odds ratio (OR) versus placebo, as well as numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and to-harm (NNH), for adding SGAs, esketamine, or lithium to antidepressants for major depressive episodes.

resultsAnalyses involved 49 drug-placebo pairs. By NNT, SGAs were more effective than placebo (NNT = 11 [CI: 9-15]); esketamine (7 [5-10]) and lithium (5 [4-10]) were even more effective. Individually, aripiprazole, olanzapine+fluoxetine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all were more effective (all NNT < 10) than quetiapine (NNT = 13), brexpiprazole (16), or cariprazine (16), with overlapping NNT CIs. Risk of adverse effects, as NNH for most-frequently reported effects, among SGAs versus placebo was 5 [4-6] overall, and highest with quetiapine (NNH = 3), lowest with brexpiprazole (19), 5 (4-6) for esketamine, and 9 (5-106) with lithium. The risk/benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was 1.80 (1.25-10.60) for lithium and much less favorable for esketamine (0.71 [0.60-0.80]) or SGAs (0.45 [0.17-0.77]).

conclusionsSeveral modern antipsychotics and esketamine appeared to be useful adjuncts to antidepressants for acute major depressive episodes, but lithium was somewhat more effective and better tolerated. LIMITATIONS: Most trials of adding lithium involved older, mainly tricyclic, antidepressants, and the dosing of adjunctive treatments were not optimized.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansKetamineLithium CompoundsMajor Depressive DisorderRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsEsketamineKetamineLithium CompoundsAntidepressantsantipsychoticscombinationdepressionefficacyesketaminelithium

Identifiers

PMID34238049
PMCPMC8358538
OpenAlexW3182403469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.