Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34238037›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022

Hair Follicle Stem Cells for Tissue Regeneration.

Alyssa Peterson, Lakshmi S Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cells · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alyssa PetersonDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Lakshmi S NairDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Novel injectable analgesic delivery system for musculoskeletal pain managementR01AR075143 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI NAIR, LAKSHMI S · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the positive outcomes of various cell therapies currently under preclinical and clinical studies, there is a significant interest in novel stem cell sources with unique therapeutic properties. Studies over the past two decades or so demonstrated the feasibility to isolate multipotent/pluripotent stem cells from hair follicles. The easy accessibility, high proliferation, and differentiation ability as well as lack of ethical concerns associated with this stem cell source make hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) attractive candidate for cell therapy and tissue engineering. This review discusses the various stem cell types identified in rodent and human hair follicles and ongoing studies on the potential use of HFSCs for skin, bone, cardiovascular, and nerve tissue engineering. Impact statement Hair follicle stem cells are an autologous stem cell source, and recent preclinical and clinical studies demonstrated its unique properties to support and accelerate tissue regeneration, making it an attractive candidate for cell therapy and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Hair FolliclePluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationHumansSkinWound Healingbiomaterialsbone tissue engineeringcardiac tissue engineeringhair follicle stem cellsnerve tissue engineeringskin tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34238037
PMCPMC9419938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.