Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2021
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 201 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
STHLM3 MR Phase 2: A New Diagnostic Chain for Prostate Cancer Detection Using the Stockholm3 Test and MR/Fusion Biopsies
Deep Learning Super Resolution Reconstruction for Fast and Motion Robust T2-weighted Prostate MRI
Super-fast 3T Prostate MRI Using High Gradient Strength and Deep Learning: Initial Experience
Integrated Noninvasive Strategy Guided by Multiparametric MRI and the Prostate Health Index for Risk-Adapted Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (INSIGHT-PCa Study)
Who cites it
201 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 359 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Evolving paradigms in prostate cancer screening: a decade of bibliometric insights and technological advancements.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- 2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review.European urology · 2023Pooled it
- Micro-ultrasound-guided biopsies versus systematic biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Imaging of Prostate Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of cognitive magnetic resonance-ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy outcomes in left lateral decubitus vs lithotomy positions: a prospective randomized study cognitive magnetic resonance-ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy.International urology and nephrology · 2025Trial
- Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Design of a magnetic resonance imaging-based screening program for early diagnosis of prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial-Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA).European radiology · 2024Trial
- Relationship Between Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen on Cancer Detection and Prostate Cancer Death: Long-term Follow-up from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.European urology · 2023Trial
- Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Trial
- Prostate MRI versus PSA screening for prostate cancer detection (the MVP Study): a randomised clinical trial.BMJ open · 2022Trial
- The value of micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer screening: A retrospective real-world feasibility study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Editorial for "AI-Assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Biparametric MRI and PI-RADS v2.1: Performance Comparison Between Novice-Level and Experienced Readers".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Urinary Biomarkers in Urological Oncology: From Biological Origin to Clinical Decision-Making-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Implementation and First Results of the Czech Nationwide Prostate Cancer Screening Pilot Program.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI with clinicopathological, molecular, and functional imaging data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Ongoing and completed clinical trials on prostate cancer screening using MRI.European radiology · 2026Review
- Real-world assessment of a deep learning neural network algorithm for prostate cancer detection in MRI using true de novo data.Medical physics · 2026Article
141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh rates of overdiagnosis are a critical barrier to organized prostate cancer screening. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with targeted biopsy has shown the potential to address this challenge, but the implications of its use in the context of organized prostate cancer screening are unknown.
methodsWe conducted a population-based noninferiority trial of prostate cancer screening in which men 50 to 74 years of age from the general population were invited by mail to participate; participants with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 3 ng per milliliter or higher were randomly assigned, in a 2:3 ratio, to undergo a standard biopsy (standard biopsy group) or to undergo MRI, with targeted and standard biopsy if the MRI results suggested prostate cancer (experimental biopsy group). The primary outcome was the proportion of men in the intention-to-treat population in whom clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥7) was diagnosed. A key secondary outcome was the detection of clinically insignificant cancers (Gleason score 6).
resultsOf 12,750 men enrolled, 1532 had PSA levels of 3 ng per milliliter or higher and were randomly assigned to undergo biopsy: 603 were assigned to the standard biopsy group and 929 to the experimental biopsy group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, clinically significant cancer was diagnosed in 192 men (21%) in the experimental biopsy group, as compared with 106 men (18%) in the standard biopsy group (difference, 3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1 to 7; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The percentage of clinically insignificant cancers was lower in the experimental biopsy group than in the standard biopsy group (4% [41 participants] vs. 12% [73 participants]; difference, -8 percentage points; 95% CI, -11 to -5).
conclusionsMRI with targeted and standard biopsy in men with MRI results suggestive of prostate cancer was noninferior to standard biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in a population-based screening-by-invitation trial and resulted in less detection of clinically insignificant cancer. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; STHLM3-MRI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03377881.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.