Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34237634›Full record

ArticleChild abuse & neglect2021

The views of children in residential care on the COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for and their well-being and psychosocial intervention.

Carme Montserrat, Marta Garcia-Molsosa, Joan Llosada-Gistau, Rosa Sitjes-Figueras

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Group Homes and COVID-19: Perspectives of Youth Residents, Staff, and Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carme MontserratUniversitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènec 9, 17004 Girona, Spain. Electronic address: carme.montserrat@udg.edu.
Marta Garcia-MolsosaUniversitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènec 9, 17004 Girona, Spain. Electronic address: marta.garcia.molsosa@cmail.cat.
Joan Llosada-GistauUniversitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènec 9, 17004 Girona, Spain.
Rosa Sitjes-FiguerasUniversitat de Girona, Plaça Sant Domènec 9, 17004 Girona, Spain.
University of Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent international research has warned of the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on vulnerable children. However, little is known regarding the in-care population.

objectiveTo find out how children in residential care perceived the influence of the COVID-19 lockdown in their everyday life, relationships and subjective well-being. PARTICIPANTS AND

setting856 children from 10 to 17 years old (M

methodsCross-sectional study. Children responded to an on-line questionnaire administered between June and July 2020. Bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression were used comparing the answers by sex.

resultsBetter relationships with caregivers (β = 9.156, [4.089-14.22], r

conclusionsA gender perspective is needed to help girls in situations of vulnerability. We should continue to listen to children's opinions, giving them the opportunity to participate in improving the children's home and its immediate environment and ensuring they have access to stable adult role models.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionAdolescentAdultChildCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Social IsolationSocial Networkingchildren's viewsCOVID-19 lockdownPsychosocial interventionResidential careWell-being

Identifiers

PMID34237634
PMCPMC8593835
OpenAlexW3176743086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.