Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34237452›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2021

The Telehealth Spine Physical Examination: A Practical Approach Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Zeeshan M Sardar, Josephine R Coury, Andrew J Luzzi, Mark Weidenbaum, K Daniel Riew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeeshan M SardarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: zms2117@cumc.columbia.edu.
Josephine R CouryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew J LuzziDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark WeidenbaumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
K Daniel RiewDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in the use of telehealth visits across the country to minimize in-person visits and to limit the spread of COVID-19. To date, no standards or outlines for telehealth spine examinations have been detailed and many surgeons simply defer the physical examination when performing telehealth visits. Nevertheless, just as physical examination of the spine is an integral part of live clinical encounters, appropriately modified physical examinations should also be part of virtual visits.

methodsIn this study we provide our methodology for guiding providers and patients in efficiently performing telehealth spine examinations.

resultsThe study details steps for efficiently performing a physical examination in the telehealth setting. Our written suggestions are supplemented with photographs and video recordings to help streamline the virtual examination.

conclusionsAn effective and efficient spine physical examination can be performed during telehealth visits. Future directions include verifying the findings from our virtual physical examination with in-person examinations.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsSpineHandHumansMaleMovementPhysical ExaminationSensationSpinal DiseasesSurgeonsTelemedicineCOVID-19SpineTelehealthVirtual examination

Identifiers

PMID34237452
PMCPMC8257415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.