Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34237058›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Sachet water consumption as a risk factor for cholera in urban settings: Findings from a case control study in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo during the 2017-2018 outbreak.

Placide Mbala-Kingebeni, Florian Vogt, Berthe Miwanda, Tresor Sundika, Nancy Mbula, Isaac Pankwa, Leopold Lubula, Veerle Vanlerberghe, Alain Magazani, Mildred Tita Afoumbom and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Placide Mbala-KingebeniInstitut National de la Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Florian VogtInstitute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2686-3149
Berthe MiwandaInstitut National de la Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-5970
Tresor SundikaFELTP DRC, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Nancy MbulaFELTP DRC, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Isaac PankwaInstitut National de la Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Leopold LubulaDGLM DRC, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Veerle VanlerbergheInstitute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6531-0793
Alain MagazaniFELTP DRC, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Mildred Tita AfoumbomHasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jean-Jacques Muyembe-TamfumInstitut National de la Recherche Biomédicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBehavioural risk factors for cholera are well established in rural and semi-urban contexts, but not in densely populated mega-cities in Sub-Saharan Africa. In November 2017, a cholera epidemic occurred in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where no outbreak had been recorded for nearly a decade. During this outbreak, we investigated context-specific risk factors for cholera in an urban setting among a population that is not frequently exposed to cholera. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe recruited 390 participants from three affected health zones of Kinshasa into a 1:1 matched case control study. Cases were identified from cholera treatment centre admission records, while controls were recruited from the vicinity of the cases' place of residence. We used standardized case report forms for the collection of socio-demographic and behavioural risk factors. We used augmented backward elimination in a conditional logistic regression model to identify risk factors. The consumption of sachet water was strongly associated with the risk of being a cholera case (p-value 0.019), which increased with increasing frequency of consumption from rarely (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.9-5.2) to often (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.6-9.9) to very often (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0-16.7). Overall, more than 80% of all participants reported consumption of this type of drinking water. The risk factors funeral attendance and contact with someone suffering from diarrhoea showed a p-value of 0.09 and 0.08, respectively. No socio-demographic characteristics were associated with the risk of cholera. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Drinking water consumption from sachets, which are sold informally on the streets in most Sub-Saharan African cities, are an overlooked route of infection in urban cholera outbreaks. Outbreak response measures need to acknowledge context-specific risk factors to remain a valuable tool in the efforts to achieve national and regional targets to reduce the burden of cholera in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildCholeraCitiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoDisease OutbreaksDrinking WaterFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsVibrio choleraeWater PollutionWater QualityDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID34237058
PMCPMC8266059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.