Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34237050›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Choice of method of place cell classification determines the population of cells identified.

Dori M Grijseels, Kira Shaw, Caswell Barry, Catherine N Hall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Place cells in CA1 lack topographical organization of firing locations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hippocampal sequences span experience relative to rewards.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. APOE4 expression confers a mild, persistent reduction in neurovascular function in the visual cortex and hippocampus of awake mice.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dori M GrijseelsSchool of Psychology and Sussex Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-5323
Kira ShawSchool of Psychology and Sussex Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-1171
Caswell BarryResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine N HallSchool of Psychology and Sussex Neuroscience, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2316-7714
University of Sussex · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S026495/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212281/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Place cells, spatially responsive hippocampal cells, provide the neural substrate supporting navigation and spatial memory. Historically most studies of these neurons have used electrophysiological recordings from implanted electrodes but optical methods, measuring intracellular calcium, are becoming increasingly common. Several methods have been proposed as a means to identify place cells based on their calcium activity but there is no common standard and it is unclear how reliable different approaches are. Here we tested four methods that have previously been applied to two-photon hippocampal imaging or electrophysiological data, using both model datasets and real imaging data. These methods use different parameters to identify place cells, including the peak activity in the place field, compared to other locations (the Peak method); the stability of cells' activity over repeated traversals of an environment (Stability method); a combination of these parameters with the size of the place field (Combination method); and the spatial information held by the cells (Information method). The methods performed differently from each other on both model and real data. In real datasets, vastly different numbers of place cells were identified using the four methods, with little overlap between the populations identified as place cells. Therefore, choice of place cell detection method dramatically affects the number and properties of identified cells. Ultimately, we recommend the Peak method be used in future studies to identify place cell populations, as this method is robust to moderate variations in place field within a session, and makes no inherent assumptions about the spatial information in place fields, unless there is an explicit theoretical reason for detecting cells with more narrowly defined properties.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlace CellsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleHippocampusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpatial Memory

Identifiers

PMID34237050
PMCPMC8291744
OpenAlexW3177921787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.