ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021
Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Using Nondiffractive Bessel Apodized Acoustic Radiation Force.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a Sidelobe-Suppressed Focused Bessel-Gaussian Modulated Beam in Acoustic Radiation Force Excitation.IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium · 2025Article
- Acoustic diffraction-resistant adaptive profile technology (ADAPT) for elasticity imaging.Science advances · 2023Article
- Imaging the Local Nonlinear Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Tissues: Initial Validation and Expected Benefits.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) has been widely used in transient shear wave elasticity imaging (SWEI). For SWEI based on focused ARFI, the highest image quality exists inside the focal zone due to the limitation of the depth of focus and diffraction. Consequently, the areas outside the focal zone and in the near field present poor image quality. To address the limitations of the focused beam, we introduce Bessel apodized ARFI that enhances image quality and improves the depth of focus. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of SWEI based on Bessel ARF in simulation and experiment. We report measurements of elastogram image quality and depth of field in tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex vivo liver tissue. Our results demonstrate improved depth of field, image quality, and shear wave speed (SWS) estimation accuracy using Bessel push beams. As a result, Bessel ARF enlarges the field of view of elastograms. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of Bessel SWEI is improved 26% compared with focused SWEI in homogeneous phantom. The estimated SWS by Bessel SWEI is closer to the measured SWS from a clinical scanner with an error of 0.3% compared to 2.4% with a focused beam. In heterogeneous phantoms, the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of shallow and deep inclusions are improved by 8.79 and 3.33 dB, respectively, under Bessel ARF. We also compare the results between Bessel SWEI and supersonic shear imaging (SSI), and the SNR of Bessel SWEI is improved by 8.1%. Compared with SSI, Bessel SWEI shows more accurate SWS estimates in high stiffness inclusions. Finally, Bessel SWEI can generate higher quality elastograms with less energy than conventional SSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.