ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2022
Mechanical performance of collagen gels is dependent on purity, α1/α2 ratio, and telopeptides.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Recent advances in sex-specific reproductive microphysiological systems for the systematic evaluation of assisted reproductive technology.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Alginate Conjugation Increases Toughness in Auricular Chondrocyte Seeded Collagen Hydrogels.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Species-Based Differences in Mechanical Properties, Cytocompatibility, and Printability of Methacrylated Collagen Hydrogels.Biomacromolecules · 2022Article
- Structural origins of cartilage shear mechanics.Science advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes the compositional, mechanical, and structural differences between collagen gels fabricated from different sources and processing methods. Despite extensive use of collagen in the manufacturing of biomaterials and implants, there is little information as to the variation in properties based on collagen source or processing methods. As such, differences in purity and composition may affect gel structure and mechanical performance. Using mass spectrometry, we assessed protein composition of collagen from seven different sources. The mechanics and gelation kinetics of each gel were assessed through oscillatory shear rheology. Scanning electron microscopy enabled visualization of distinct differences in fiber morphology. Mechanics and gelation kinetics differed with source and processing method and were found to correlate with differences in composition. Gels fabricated from telopeptide-containing collagens had higher storage modulus (144 vs. 54 Pa) and faster gelation (251 vs. 734 s) compared to atelocollagens, despite having lower purity (93.4 vs. 99.8%). For telopeptide-containing collagens, as collagen purity increased, storage modulus increased and fiber diameter decreased. As α1/α2 chain ratio increased, fiber diameter increased and gelation slowed. As such, this study provides an examination of the effects of collagen processing on key quality attributes for use of collagen gels in biomedical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.