Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236683›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Making Visualization Work for You: Deriving Valuable Insights from Omics Data.

Alexander Yemelin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Two Novel Dimorphism-Related Virulence Factors ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander YemelinInstitute of Biotechnology and Drug Research gGmbH (IBWF), Mainz, Germany. yemelin@ibwf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Omics" technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) have significantly improved our understanding of biological systems. They have become standard tools in biological research, for example, identifying and unraveling transcriptional networks, building predictive models, and discovering candidate biomarkers. The rapid increase of omics data presents both a challenge and great potential when it comes to providing valuable insights into the underlying patterns of the investigated biological processes. The challenge is extracting, processing, integrating, and interpreting the corresponding datasets. The potential, on the other hand, arises from generation of verifiable hypotheses to understand molecular mechanisms behind biological processes, for example, gene expression patterns. Exploratory data analysis techniques are used to get a first impression of the important characteristics of a dataset and to reveal its underlying structure. However, investigators are often faced with the difficulties of managing the high-dimensional nature of the data. In order to efficiently analyze biological data and to gain a deeper understanding of underlying biological mechanisms, it is essential to have robust and interactive data visualization tools.

Indexed as

GenomicsMetabolomicsData VisualizationGene Regulatory NetworksProteomicsBokehData explorationInteractive visualizationJupyter notebookMagnaporthe oryzaePanel frameworkPaperBLASTPythonRNA-seq analysisTranscriptomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.