Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236668›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Integrative Analysis of Incongruous Cancer Genomics and Proteomics Datasets.

Karla Cervantes-Gracia, Richard Chahwan, Holger Husi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karla Cervantes-GraciaInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Richard ChahwanInstitute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Holger HusiInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Holger.Husi@uhi.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease characterized by molecular heterogeneity and the involvement of several cellular mechanisms throughout its evolution and pathogenesis. Despite the great efforts made to untangle these mechanisms, cancer pathophysiology remains far from clear. So far, panels of biomarkers have been reported from high-throughput data generated through different platforms. These biomarkers are primarily focused on one type of coding molecules such as transcripts or proteins, mainly due to the apparent heterogeneity of output data resulting from the use of various techniques specific to the molecular type. Hence, there is a major need to understand how these molecules interact and complement each other to be able to explain the deregulated processes involved. The breadth of large-scale data availability as well as the lack of in-depth analysis of publicly available data has raised concerns and enabled opportunities for new strategies to analyze "Big data" more comprehensively. Here, a new protocol to perform integrative analysis based on a systems biology approach is described. The foundation of the approach relies on groups of datasets from published studies compared within the original described groups and organized in a designated format to allow the integration and cross-comparison among different studies and different platforms. This approach follows an unbiased hypothesis-free methodology that will facilitate the identification of commonalities among different data-set sources, and ultimately map and characterize specific molecular pathways using significantly deregulated molecules. This in turn will generate novel insights about the mechanisms deregulated in complex diseases such as cancer.

Indexed as

GenomicsNeoplasmsProteomicsBiomarkersHumansSystems BiologyBiomarkersCancerHigh-throughput dataIntegrative analysisMolecular biomarkersOMICSSystems biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.