Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236667›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction.

Arian R Jamasb, Ben Day, Cătălina Cangea, Pietro Liò, Tom L Blundell

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein-protein interaction prediction with deep learning: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arian R JamasbDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ben DayDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cătălina CangeaDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Pietro LiòDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tom L BlundellDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. tom@cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 200814/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are central to cellular functions. Experimental methods for predicting PPIs are well developed but are time and resource expensive and suffer from high false-positive error rates at scale. Computational prediction of PPIs is highly desirable for a mechanistic understanding of cellular processes and offers the potential to identify highly selective drug targets. In this chapter, details of developing a deep learning approach to predicting which residues in a protein are involved in forming a PPI-a task known as PPI site prediction-are outlined. The key decisions to be made in defining a supervised machine learning project in this domain are here highlighted. Alternative training regimes for deep learning models to address shortcomings in existing approaches and provide starting points for further research are discussed. This chapter is written to serve as a companion to developing deep learning approaches to protein-protein interaction site prediction, and an introduction to developing geometric deep learning projects operating on protein structure graphs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSupervised Machine LearningProteinsDeep learningGeometric deep learningGraphMachine learningProteinProtein–protein interactionStructural biologyStructure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.