Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236664›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Protein Secretion Prediction Tools and Extracellular Vesicles Databases.

Daniela Cecconi, Claudia Di Carlo, Jessica Brandi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela CecconiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudia Di CarloDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jessica BrandiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. jessica.brandi@univr.it.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secreted proteins play important roles in several biological processes such as growth, proliferation differentiation, cell-cell communication, migration, and apoptosis; moreover, these extracellular molecules mediate homeostasis by influencing the cross-talking within the surrounding tissues. Currently, the research area of cell secretome has become of great interest since the profiling of secreted proteins could be essential for the biomarker discovery and for the identification of new therapeutic strategies. Several bioinformatic platforms have been implemented for the in silico characterization of secreted proteins: this chapter describes a typical workflow for the analysis of proteins secreted by cultured cells through bioinformatic approaches. Central issue is related to discrimination between proteins secreted by classical and non-classical pathways. Therefore, specific prediction tools for the classification of candidate secreted proteins are here presented.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualProteinsProteomeSecretomeProteinsProteomeBioinformatic toolsClassical and non-classical secretionSecretome

Identifiers

PMID34236664
OpenAlexW3180392959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.