ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Software Options for the Analysis of MS-Proteomic Data.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variability analysis of LC-MS experimental factors and their impact on machine learning.GigaScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is currently the most successful approach to measure and compare peptides and proteins in a large variety of biological samples. Modern mass spectrometers, equipped with high-resolution analyzers, provide large amounts of data output. This is the case of shotgun/bottom-up proteomics, which consists in the enzymatic digestion of protein into peptides that are then measured by MS-instruments through a data dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. Dedicated bioinformatic tools and platforms have been developed to face the increasing size and complexity of raw MS data that need to be processed and interpreted for large-scale protein identification and quantification. This chapter illustrates the most popular bioinformatics solution for the analysis of shotgun MS-proteomics data. A general description will be provided on the data preprocessing options and the different search engines available, including practical suggestions on how to optimize the parameters for peptide search, based on hands-on experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.