ArticleNeurocritical care2021
A Precision Medicine Framework for Classifying Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Advanced Classification of Consciousness Endotypes (ACCESS).
Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal prediction of residual consciousness in the intensive care unit: the CONNECT-ME study.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Trial
- Impact of a Specialized Care Pathway for ICU Patients With Disorders of Consciousness: Observational Insights From an Expert Center.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Stepwise clinical and diagnostic strategy for coma of unknown origin.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- The Impact of Frailty on Functional Outcome in Neurointensive Care Patients.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Sleep spindles as a predictor of cognitive motor dissociation and recovery of consciousness after acute brain injury.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
- The Pupillary Light-Off Reflex in Acute Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Apomorphine for prolonged disorders of consciousness: a multimodal open-label study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Outcomes and Endpoints.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Recovery of consciousness after acute brain injury: a narrative review.Journal of intensive care · 2024Review
- Restoring consciousness with pharmacologic therapy: Mechanisms, targets, and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024Review
- Disclosing Results of Tests for Covert Consciousness: A Framework for Ethical Translation.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
- Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Behavioral Phenotyping.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- A National Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy in India: Revisiting the Curing Coma Campaign Come Together Survey.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Common data elements for disorders of consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Cognitive Motor Dissociation: Gap Analysis and Future Directions.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Detecting signatures of consciousness in acute brain injury after stimulation with apomorphine and methylphenidate: protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study.BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
- Covert consciousness.NeuroRehabilitation · 2024Article
- Covert cortical processing: a diagnosis in search of a definition.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- Research considerations for prospective studies of patients with coma and disorders of consciousness.Brain communications · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsciousness in patients with brain injury is traditionally assessed based on semiological evaluation at the bedside. This classification is limited because of low granularity, ill-defined and rigid nomenclatures incompatible with the highly fluctuating nature of consciousness, failure to identify specific brain states like cognitive motor dissociation, and neglect for underlying biological mechanisms. Here, the authors present a pragmatic framework based on consciousness endotypes that combines clinical phenomenology with all essential physiological and biological data, emphasizing recovery trajectories, therapeutic potentials and clinical feasibility.
methodsThe Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign identified an international group of experts who convened in a series of online meetings between May and November 2020 to discuss and propose a novel framework for classifying consciousness.
resultsThe expert group proposes Advanced Classification of Consciousness Endotypes (ACCESS), a tiered multidimensional framework reflecting increasing complexity and an aspiration to consider emerging and future approaches. Tier 1 is based on clinical phenotypes and structural imaging. Tier 2 adds functional measures including EEG, PET and functional MRI, that can be summarized using the Arousal, Volition, Cognition and Mechanisms (AVCM) score (where "Volition" signifies volitional motor responses). Finally, Tier 3 reflects dynamic changes over time with a (theoretically infinite) number of physiologically distinct states to outline consciousness recovery and identify opportunities for therapeutic interventions.
conclusionsWhereas Tiers 1 and 2 propose an approach for low-resource settings and state-of-the-art expertise at leading academic centers, respectively, Tier 3 is a visionary multidimensional consciousness paradigm driven by continuous incorporation of new knowledge while addressing the Curing Coma Campaign's aspirational goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34236621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.