ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2022
Application of machine learning analysis based on diffusion tensor imaging to identify REM sleep behavior disorder.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the ictal-interictal continuum using artificial intelligence: a prospective observational cohort study.Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Federated learning for multi-omics: A performance evaluation in Parkinson's disease.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder and its relation to Parkinson's disease: The potential of graph measures as brain biomarkers to identify the underlying physiopathology of the disorder.Brain and behavior · 2024Review
- Federated Learning for multi-omics: a performance evaluation in Parkinson's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Advanced sleep disorder detection using multi-layered ensemble learning and advanced data balancing techniques.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Brain MRI Biomarkers in Isolated Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder: Where Are We? A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Can Artificial Intelligence Diagnose Transient Global Amnesia Using Electroencephalography Data?Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Multi-modality machine learning predicting Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- Diffusion Abnormality in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients With Sleep Disorders: A Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the feasibility of machine learning analysis using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters to identify patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD). We hypothesized that patients with idiopathic RBD could be identified via machine learning analysis based on DTI.
methodsWe enrolled 20 patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic RBD at a tertiary hospital. We also included 20 healthy subjects as a control group. All of the subjects underwent DTI. We obtained the conventional DTI parameters and structural connectomic profiles from the DTI. We investigated the differences in conventional DTI measures and structural connectomic profiles between patients with idiopathic RBD and healthy controls. We then used machine learning analysis using a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm to identify patients with idiopathic RBD using conventional DTI and structural connectomic profiles.
resultsSeveral regions showed significant differences in conventional DTI measures and structural connectomic profiles between patients with idiopathic RBD and healthy controls. The SVM classifier based on conventional DTI measures revealed an accuracy of 87.5% and an area under the curve of 0.900 to identify patients with idiopathic RBD. Another SVM classifier based on structural connectomic profiles yielded an accuracy of 75.0% and an area under the curve of 0.833.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning analysis based on DTI to identify patients with idiopathic RBD. The conventional DTI parameters might be more important than the structural connectomic profiles in identifying patients with idiopathic RBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.