ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2022
Costs and management of patients with hemophilia A in France: the Hemraude study.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haemophilia in France: Modelisation of the Clinical Pathway for Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Hemraude study was conducted to describe the profile of patients with HA, disease management, and economic burden in a collective perspective.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted using the French administrative healthcare claims database SNIIRAM/SNDS. Male patients treated for hemophilia A with a long-term illness (ALD) status or invalidity were included in the study between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Patients were classified in six treatment groups: no treatment, on-demand FVIII, prophylactic FVIII, FVIII in immune tolerance induction (ITI) protocol, on-demand bypassing agents, and prophylactic bypassing agents. Patients treated with FVIII in ITI protocol and those treated with bypassing agents are deemed to have developed inhibitors. HA patients were compared to a control population without coagulation disorder and matched (ratio 1:3) on age and sex.
resultsA total of 4172 patients were included in the analysis, aged on average 35.2 years, 5.3% had HIV infection, and 8.8% had hepatitis B or C. In 2017, half of the patients received no treatment for HA, 46.7% were treated with FVIII (25% on demand, 20.6% with prophylaxis, and 1.1% ITI), 1.5% with bypassing agents. Patients treated with prophylactic treatments, either inhibitor or non-inhibitor, were less likely to be hospitalized for severe bleeding compared to patients receiving on-demand treatments. The average annual costs for HA management per patient were 72,209.60 €. The highest costs were observed in patients treated with FVIII in ITI protocol and those receiving prophylactic bypassing agents.
conclusionDirect costs of HA treatments for HA may be very high especially in the small percentage of patients developing inhibitors or treated with ITI protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.