ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022
Reverse distal femoral locking compression plate (DF-LCP), does it fit and how to fit on Asian's proximal femurs? A cadaveric study.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The utility of reverse distal femur locking compression plate in minimally invasive osteosynthesis for type C subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: technical description and a clinical series of 50 cases.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionReverse distal femoral locking compression plates (DF-LCP) have been used as an alternative treatment in complex proximal femur fractures.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the compatibility of reverse DF-LCP with Asian proximal femurs, to determine the matching patterns and integrate information to establish guidelines for correct application.
methodsTwenty-eight adult cadaveric femurs were obtained from 5 males and 9 females with an average age of 69.27 years (range 59-85). A contralateral 13-hole DF-LCP was applied with MIPO technique using the vastus ridge as a landmark for Hole A. The first locking screw was inserted through Hole A under fluoroscopic guidance just above the femoral head-neck junction in AP view and centered of the neck in lateral view, followed by three proximal locking screws. The number of screws successfully inserted through the femoral neck, including any penetration of femoral neck, the gap between anterior and posterior borders between plate and bone, the anatomical parameters of proximal femur, and any mismatches between the plate and the bone were recorded.
resultsMost of the screws (82.1%) in Holes A, D, E, and F were put into the femoral neck without breaking through. The average distance from the entry point at the vastus ridge to the anterior cortex of the femur was 17.3 ± 2.3 mm and from the posterior cortex was 19.46 ± 2.55 mm. The anterior gap was 4.93 ± 1.01 mm, and the posterior gap was 13.48 ± 1.44 mm. The mismatch where the distal part of the plate started to lift off from the bone > 2 mm at the 8th hole with an average distance of 2.78 ± 2.01 mm. That distance gradually increased distally to an average of 9.38 ± 6.03 mm at the 13th hole.
conclusionsReverse DF-LCP can fit most proximal femurs in the Asian population and can be used as an alternative implant when performed using an appropriate technique. However, as a relatively consistent mismatch was found at the distal part starting at the 8th hole, so if a plate is longer than 9 holes, the plate contouring should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34236513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.