Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236512›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022

Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilms adherence to PEEK and titanium-alloy prosthetic spine devices.

Luiz Gustavo Dal Oglio da Rocha, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Ana Paula de Andrade, Geiziane Aparecida Gonçalves, Letícia Kraft, Juliette Cieslinski, Paula Hansen Suss, Felipe Francisco Tuon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A customizable and defined medium supporting culturing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luiz Gustavo Dal Oglio da RochaHospital Universitário Cajuru - HUC, Spine Department. Pontifícia, Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Avenida São José, 300, Curitiba, Paraná, 80050-350, Brazil.
Victoria Stadler Tasca RibeiroLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Ana Paula de AndradeLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Geiziane Aparecida GonçalvesLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Letícia KraftLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Juliette CieslinskiLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Paula Hansen SussLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Felipe Francisco TuonLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil. felipe.tuon@pucpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-1786
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTitanium and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interbody cages are commonly used for spine fusion. Few data are known about bacterial and yeast biofilms formation in these implants. The aim of this study was to compare Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilm formation in the surface of two different interbody devices used routinely in spine surgery.

methodsSix bodies of proof specimens of PEEK and titanium alloy were used for microbiological tests, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Experimental biofilm was produced with Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans, followed by quantitative analysis of planktonic cells and sessile cells. The comparison between the medians of biofilm quantification between the two models was performed using the Mann-Whitney test and considered the statistical difference for a p < 0.05.

resultsIn the S. aureus model, in both planktonic and sessile cell counts, titanium-alloy samples showed lower values for colony forming units per milliliter (UFC/mL) (p < 0.05). The evaluation through the optic density of planktonic and sessile cells showed lower values in the titanium-alloy samples, however, only statistically significant in planktonic cell count (p < 0.05). The count of planktonic yeast cells in PEEK was similar to titanium-alloy samples, while the count of sessile yeast cells in titanium alloy was lower when compared to PEEK (p < 0.05).

conclusionTitanium-alloy models were associated with less staphylococcal and Candida biofilm formation when compared with PEEK.

Indexed as

Staphylococcal InfectionsTitaniumAlloysBenzophenonesBiofilmsCandida albicansHumansKetonesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersStaphylococcus aureusAlloysBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersTitaniumBiofilmInfectionPEEKTitanium alloy

Identifiers

PMID34236512
OpenAlexW3181163041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.