Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236509›Full record

ArticlePlanta2021

Plastome evolution in the Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae) and its application in phylogenomics and populations genetics.

Paulo Aecyo, André Marques, Bruno Huettel, Ana Silva, Tiago Esposito, Elâine Ribeiro, Inara R Leal, Edeline Gagnon, Gustavo Souza, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The complete plastid genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  6. Phylogenomics and plastome evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulo AecyoLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-5603
André MarquesMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-2576
Bruno HuettelMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-1714
Ana SilvaLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-8213
Tiago EspositoLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0143-6450
Elâine RibeiroLaboratory of Plant-Animal Interaction, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-1004
Inara R LealLaboratory of Plant-Animal Interaction, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-2191
Edeline GagnonRoyal Botanic Garden of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-9688
Gustavo SouzaLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-6097
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics and Evolution, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil. andrea.harand@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-4770
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DERoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe chloroplast genomes of Caesalpinia group species are structurally conserved, but sequence level variation is useful for both phylogenomic and population genetic analyses. Variation in chloroplast genomes (plastomes) has been an important source of information in plant biology. The Caesalpinia group has been used as a model in studies correlating ecological and genomic variables, yet its intergeneric and infrageneric relationships are not fully solved, despite densely sampled phylogenies including nuclear and plastid loci by Sanger sequencing. Here, we present the de novo assembly and characterization of plastomes from 13 species from the Caesalpinia group belonging to eight genera. A comparative analysis was carried out with 13 other plastomes previously available, totalizing 26 plastomes and representing 15 of the 26 known Caesalpinia group genera. All plastomes showed a conserved quadripartite structure and gene repertoire, except for the loss of four ndh genes in Erythrostemon gilliesii. Thirty polymorphic regions were identified for inter- or intrageneric analyses. The 26 aligned plastomes were used for phylogenetic reconstruction, revealing a well-resolved topology, and dividing the Caesalpinia group into two fully supported clades. Sixteen microsatellite (cpSSR) loci were selected from Cenostigma microphyllum for primer development and at least two were cross-amplified in different Leguminosae subfamilies by in vitro or in silico approaches. Four loci were used to assess the genetic diversity of C. microphyllum in the Brazilian Caatinga. Our results demonstrate the structural conservation of plastomes in the Caesalpinia group, offering insights into its systematics and evolution, and provides new genomic tools for future phylogenetic, population genetics, and phylogeographic studies.

Indexed as

CaesalpiniaGenome, ChloroplastBrazilGenetics, PopulationPhylogenyCaesalpinioideaeCenostigmaChloroplast genomecpSSRGenetic diversitySeasonally tropical dry forest

Identifiers

PMID34236509
OpenAlexW3183030790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.