ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2022
[Exchange of aniridia IOLs for customized iris IOL implants].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Implantation of an aniridia ring for complicated cataract and iris defects].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThree groups of iris prostheses can be distinguished for the surgical treatment of iris defects: (1) segmental iris implants, (2) combined iris diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) and (3) pure iris implants. Most iris reconstructions are accompanied by aphakia correction with secondary IOL implantation. Although the primary goal is to create a pupil and to improve glare perception, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, the esthetic result is also a relevant component.
objectiveFunctional and esthetic results after replacement of an aniridia IOL implant with a custom-made artificial iris with IOL. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this retrospective study with seven eyes from seven patients, an iris diaphragm IOL (Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was exchanged for medical reasons (subluxation) against a custom-made artificial iris made of silicone (ArtificialIris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) in combination with a sutured IOL. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), complications, glare perception as well as esthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.
resultsThe BCVA and ECC showed no statistically significant change between the preoperative and postoperative values (p > 0.05). There was a decentration of the iris IOL implant of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm three months postoperatively. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 (1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied), satisfaction with the overall result was rated 8.6 ± 2.5. Subjective glare perception improved to 5.6 ± 3.5 and subjective esthetic impairment improved to 2.4 ± 2.0 on the VAS (1 = none, 10 = extremely strong). Postoperative complications included transient intraocular hypotonia in two eyes, intraocular pressure increase in two eyes, retinal detachment and transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye each. Of the seven patients six would repeat the procedure.
conclusionCompared to a rigid aniridia IOL implant, replacement with a custom-made artificial iris in combination with an IOL provides not only a good functional result but simultaneously also an esthetically pleasing result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.