ReviewDer Orthopade2021
[Spinal deformity in neurofibromatosis type 1].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-Time navigation calibration for pedicle screw placement in neurofibromatosis Type 1-associated scoliosis: An anatomical variability-stratified accuracy study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Neurofibromatosis type 1 with huge intrathoracic meningoceles misdiagnosed as pleural effusion: A case report and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
- [Neurofibromatosis type 1 : From diagnosis to follow-up].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith a prevalence of up to 60%, spinal deformity represents the most common skeletal manifestation of neurofibromatosis type 1. The deformity can occur as a non-dystrophic or as a less common dystrophic type. This distinction is of great relevance because the therapeutic strategy is completely different in each case. NON-DYSTROPHIC TYPE: The non-dystrophic type can be treated like idiopathic scoliosis due to the comparable behavior of both entities. However, care must be taken regarding the so-called modulation. Modulation describes the formation of dysplasias of the spine. This will result in a progression behavior as known from the dystrophic type. DYSTROPHIC TYPE: For the dystrophic type, different spinal dysplastic changes are typical. These lead to a rapid progression of deformity and a lack of response to conservative treatment. If untreated, severe and grotesque deformities can arise. This type of deformity requires early surgical intervention, even in childhood. The knowledge about the peculiarities of this disease in general, as well as the typical changes of the spine are prerequisites to managing these often-challenging situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.