Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34236290›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study using a web-based survey.

Saeed Mastour Alshahrani, Salem Dehom, Diaa Almutairi, Badr Saud Alnasser, Bandar Alsaif, Ahmed A Alabdrabalnabi, Abdullah Bin Rahmah, Mastour Safar Alshahrani, Ashraf El-Metwally, Badr F Al-Khateeb and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Saudi Arabia.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: knowledge and beliefs.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Saeed Mastour AlshahraniCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2714-7785
Salem DehomDepartment of Graduate Studies, Loma Linda University - School of Nursing, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Diaa AlmutairiDepartment of Oral Health, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Badr Saud AlnasserDepartment of Health Management, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Ha'il, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-7412
Bandar AlsaifDepartment of Public Health, University of Ha'il, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-7396
Ahmed A AlabdrabalnabiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Bin RahmahCollege of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mastour Safar AlshahraniDental Department, Ministry of Health, Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf El-MetwallyCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-7148
Badr F Al-KhateebCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatmah OthmanCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Mahtab AlamCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-6988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of COVID-19 vaccination depends on individual's vaccine acceptance. There has been misinformation on the media that doubts its effectiveness, safety, and long-term risk. Such controversy could affect the acceptance toward the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. The objective of this study was to assess the factors influencing the acceptance and hesitancy toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study was conducted. An online survey was conducted with four parameters: Demographics, medical history, knowledge and information sources about COVID-19 and vaccine, and hesitancy/acceptance of vaccinations. Bivariate analysis between several survey items and the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine was conducted using Chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to assess to what degree each variable affects the acceptance and the hesitancy toward the COVID-19 vaccine. Approximately 64% show a desire to accept the vaccine while 18.3% were extremely hesitant to take the vaccine. Non-demographic factors that were associated with the acceptance toward the COVID-19 vaccine were the source of health information about COVID-19 (OR:1.63; 95% CI:1.07-2.47), perception toward whether the vaccine is effective on other variants of the virus (OR:7.24; 95% CI:4.58-11.45), previous uptake of the influenza vaccine (OR:1.62; 95% CI:1.07-2.47), and potential mandatory of vaccination in order to travel internationally (OR:16.52; 95% CI:10.23-26.68). This study provides an insight into factors - other than the sociodemographic - influencing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia. The government should address the COVID-19-related misinformation and rumors to increase acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesacceptanceCOVID-19hesitancyquestionnaireSaudi Arabiavaccine

Identifiers

PMID34236290
PMCPMC8437496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.